I'm a little behind on reading NV-L mail, but I have a follow-up question on
this one.
Are you using the Campus Manager or User Tracking applications to manage the
10,000 devices? If so, I would really like to talk to you. We are having
difficulties using Campus Manager with more than 500 devices, and Cisco told
us that the maximum they recommend is 1000.
Joel A. Gerber - USAA Information Technology Co. - San Antonio, TX
* (210)913-4231 * mailto:Joel.Gerber@USAA.com " http://www.usaa.com
-----Original Message-----
From: CHANCELLOR.D.ELLIS@customs.treas.gov
[SMTP:CHANCELLOR.D.ELLIS@customs.treas.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 06:16
To: IBM NetView Discussion
Subject: Re[2]: FW: [NV-L] CiscWorks2000 and Netview together on one
Correction, CW2000 is available on AIX. We currently have it running
on our backup production and test systems. Seems to work fine with
Netview 6.0.1 on the same box. We are managing about 10,000 devices
and both applications seem to keep up just fine. Just be sure you have
a ton of disk space to throw at it.
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: RE: FW: [NV-L] CiscWorks2000 and Netview together on one AIX
Author: "IBM NetView Discussion" <nv-l@tkg.com> at smtplink
Date: 11/28/00 6:46 AM
Just one issue: It doesn't exist. CW2000 is only available on Solaris
running on Sparc.
BR. Michael.
-----Original Message-----
From: Yong Choon Hwa [mailto:chyong@internoc.com.sg]
Sent: 28. november 2000 10:04
To: 'IBM NetView Discussion'
Subject: RE: FW: [NV-L] CiscWorks2000 and Netview together on one AIX
serv er
Have you try CW2000 on a Solaris 8 for Intel Platform Version machine?
If yes, any known issue?
yong
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leslie Clark [SMTP:lclark@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 10:15 AM
> To: IBM NetView Discussion
> Subject: Re: FW: [NV-L] CiscWorks2000 and Netview together on one AIX
> server
>
> The way I prefer to look at this de-emphasis is that it provides a good
> way
> to get CiscoWorks2000 off the Netview box. Put it on an NT box nearby.
> It's
> such a resource-hog, and Intel servers can be cost-effective. It frees up
> resources for Netview.
>
> Cordially,
>
> Leslie A. Clark
> IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
> Detroit
>
>
> "Gavin Newman" <NEWMANGJ@banksa.com.au>@tkg.com on 11/27/2000 07:00:01 PM
>
> Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
>
> Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com
>
>
> To: nv-l@tkg.com
> cc:
> Subject: Re: FW: [NV-L] CiscWorks2000 and Netview together on one AIX
> server
>
>
>
> When I was discussing CiscoWorks with my Cisco rep recently he said that
> Cisco were "de-emphasising" all platforms except for NT and Solaris, AIX
> and HP-UX were being placed on a "care & maintenance" basis and that their
> strategic platform for the future was to be NT. Read into that what you
> will but it seems to me that they really want everything running on NT
> (God
> help us all!) and that Unix was a non-event for them.
>
> His personal opinion was that the "logic" behind this direction was the
> cost of the supporting hardware and the cost & availability of staff to
> code on the various OS'es. Every man and his dog seems to be an NT expert
> whereas we true Unix afficiandos are seen to be a dying breed. Obviously I
> beg to differ but you can't fight the powers that be.
>
> >>> "Pretorius, Vynita" <VPretorius@fnb.co.za> 27/11/2000 18:01:02 >>>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pretorius, Vynita
> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 6:59 PM
> To: 'IBM NetView Discussion'
> Subject: RE: [NV-L] CiscWorks2000 and Netview together on one AIX server
>
>
> Hi
>
> I asked my vendor of Ciscoworks2000 if it worked on AIX and he said it was
> not ported to AIX and was available to SUN(SOLARIS) and NT, Unlike
> Ciscoworks 4 which required a NMS to plug into and would run on AIX.
>
> If I have been misinformed I would really like to know.
>
> Thanks
> Vynita
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edvyn.Lek@BANKOFAMERICA.COM [mailto:Edvyn.Lek@BANKOFAMERICA.COM]
> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 5:50 PM
> To: IBM NetView Discussion
> Subject: Re: [NV-L] CiscWorks2000 and Netview together on one AIX server
>
>
>
>
> If small network (less than 1000 devices), okay; otherwise on different
> server
> please.
>
>
>
>
>
> Yong Choon Hwa <chyong@internoc.com.sg> on 11/22/2000 10:10:45 PM
>
> Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
>
> To: "'IBM NetView Discussion' (E-mail)" <nv-l@tkg.com>
> cc:
> Subject: [NV-L] CiscWorks2000 and Netview together on one AIX server
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Not long ago, someone asked about the similar question on installing
> CiscoWorks2000 and Netview in a NT server.
> I wonder if it will equally harmful on a Unix box?
> Would it affect the performance?
> Please pour in your view.
>
> Appreciate all contribution
>
> Thank you
> Yong
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> ***** IMPORTANT INFORMATION *****
> This document should be read only by those persons to whom
> it is addressed and its content is not intended for use by
> any other persons. If you have received this message in
> error, please notify us immediately. Please also destroy and
> delete the message from your computer. Any unauthorised form
> of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited.
> Bank SA is not liable for the proper and complete transmission
> of the information contained in this communication, nor for any
> delay in its receipt.
> **********************************************************************
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
|