To: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Re: Re: ovwdb: strange objects |
From: | "Hasty, Buddie" <buddie.hasty@2ndwaveinc.com> |
Date: | Tue, 8 May 2001 10:19:43 -0500 |
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. I don't know how I got on this distribution list, but could someone remove me. I have no need for the info being displayed, although very good I must admit. Thanks Buddie -----Original Message----- From: helmut.schroeder.hs@bayer-ag.de [mailto:helmut.schroeder.hs@bayer-ag.de] Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 10:09 AM To: IBM NetView Discussion Subject: Re: Re: [NV-L] Re: ovwdb: strange objects Found the faster solution to get rid of objects that just contain only one field Selection Name=Selection Name<nnnnnn> (ovtopofix does not work, ovwdbdmap -d ... takes too long to remove several thousand objects and I don't want to rediscover everything): Add to every incomplete object a field IP Hostname=dummy<nnnn> with nvdbimport and run an ovtopofix afterwards. ovtopofix will now remove the incomplete objects. Cheers - Helmut Schroeder "Leslie Clark" <lclark@us.ibm.com>@tkg.com on 04.05.2001 04:17:38 Bitte antworten an IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com> Gesendet von: owner-nv-l@tkg.com An: IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com> Kopie: Blindkopie: Thema: Re: [NV-L] Re: ovwdb: strange objects Can I come over and redo your map? It is my favorite thing to do;) If I were you, I would plan on doing a rediscovery to get the migrated junk out of there. Look at the output of 'ovtopodump -l' and compare the numbers of nodes, interfaces, networks, etc to the number of objects after an ovtopofix. There were a number of problems with this sort of object in V3 and early V4. You will be glad you did after it is done. Before doing that, though, you can do a lot of planning, so the time to recreate the map will be as short as possible. 1) You can generate a complete seedfile, in sections, by parsing the output of ovtopodump -rl, and grouping routers (near to far) and then separate lists of hubs, servers, etc, and the rules of course. 2) You can practice and test the design of the location.conf file. Using your existing database, you can put a draft location.conf file in place and then 'File...New Map'. The new map will use that file. Do it over a couple of times until you get it right. This only places networks in location submaps, and that might make it look worse at first. but don't worry. 3) Make a smartset of isLocation is True. This makes it easy to find those little tiny location icons for cutting and pasting. 4) You can use nvdbimport to set fields on routers that indicate which location submap they go in. A few simple scripts can generate the import file. 5) You can use Locate...By Attribute, then View..Highlights..Select Highlights to select things too tiny to see, then cut (make sure you use the menu pick on the correct submap) and paste into the location icon. Use this on the routers, referencing that field you created. You cannot leave any users up while rediscovering, since the entire database is flushed (except smartset and apm definitions). But with planning, you could redo it in one long evening. Or two, if you want to take a backup, flush and discover and work on it a while, then back that up and restore the old one for another day, and repeat. Or get another box, rediscover from there, and port the database back to the production machine. Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking Detroit "Francois Le Hir/Quebec/IBM" <flehir@CA.IBM.COM>@tkg.com on 05/03/2001 01:38:42 PM Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com> Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com To: "NetView List" <nv-l@tkg.com> cc: Subject: [NV-L] Re: ovwdb: strange objects Hi, I am running Netview 6.02 on AIX 4.3.3 I also have about 120 entries with strange "FIELD VALUE": "Selection Name" or "Selection Name+Number" or just a Number. I also have lots of entries in the same field with "REMOVED:Name" or with the name of a machine that has been removed from the network for years. Is this normal ? I migrated this database from Netview 5.1 to Netview 6 and I know it was migrated from Netview 4 before and probably even from an earlier version. I don't know if it's growing : this is the first time I see these entries. When I did the migration from Netview 5.1, I asked support if it was normal to have such a big database for the size of our network. I was told that it was not a problem. We have about 300 routers, 500 servers and less than 20 000 computers on the network. ovobjprint gives me 132816 objects in database and this number is growing. should I be concerned about the size of my database ? I know it would be good for cleaning to rediscover the network, but it's such a work to put every node back in it's place that I am little bit afraid to start such a process. It is possible to restart a discovery in a new map while operator are doing production work on the original map on the same server ? Thanks, Francois Le Hir Network Projects & Consulting Services IBM Global Services Phone: (514) 205 6695 -------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 16:11:16 -0400 From: "Leslie Clark" <lclark@us.ibm.com> Subject: Re: ovwdb: strange objects Helmut, I have not seen that happen in years. I keep an eye out for them because long ago there were some code problems that could cause them. But I don't see it any more. Have you been migrating the same database since V4? If I saw that, even if they were not growing, I would schedule time for a rediscovery just to get it clean. If it is growing, call Support. If not, weigh the pain and either ignore it or clean it up. Or call Support. And I will say it again, you should always be prepared to rediscover or restore your database. Stuff happens. I would take a backup of this, and restore from an old backup and check to see if they were always there. If they were, you can just restore your most current one ( if you have the fix for pax installed). Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking Detroit helmut.schroeder.hs@bayer-ag.de@tkg.com on 04/17/2001 11:47:18 AM Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com> Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com To: nv-l@tkg.com cc: Subject: [NV-L] ovwdb: strange objects Hi, This is NV 6.01 in AIX 4.3.3: Checking our object DB, I found about 9.000 objects with no fields but Selection Name as follows: OBJECT: 134765 FIELD ID FIELD NAME FIELD VALUE 10 Selection Name "Selection Name134765" OBJECT: 134766 FIELD ID FIELD NAME FIELD VALUE 10 Selection Name "Selection Name134766" .... I have no idea where they came from - ovtopofix changes nothing. ... I don't really want to restore from backup because they seem to be there for quite a while. Any ideas ? Thanks in advance .... Helmut Schroeder _________________________________________________________________________ NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l _________________________________________________________________________ NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l _________________________________________________________________________ NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l I don't know how I got on this distribution list, but could someone remove me. I have no need for the info being displayed, although very good I must admit. Thanks
-----Original Message-----
Found the faster solution to get rid of objects that just contain only one field
Add to every incomplete object a field IP Hostname=dummy<nnnn>
Cheers - Helmut Schroeder "Leslie Clark" <lclark@us.ibm.com>@tkg.com on 04.05.2001 04:17:38 Bitte antworten an IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com> Gesendet von: owner-nv-l@tkg.com An: IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
Can I come over and redo your map? It is my favorite thing to do;)
Before doing that, though, you can do a lot of planning, so the time to
1) You can generate a complete seedfile, in sections, by parsing the
You cannot leave any users up while rediscovering, since the entire
Cordially, Leslie A. Clark
"Francois Le Hir/Quebec/IBM" <flehir@CA.IBM.COM>@tkg.com on 05/03/2001
Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com> Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com To: "NetView List" <nv-l@tkg.com>
Hi, I am running Netview 6.02 on AIX 4.3.3 I also have about 120 entries with strange "FIELD VALUE": "Selection Name"
I migrated this database from Netview 5.1 to Netview 6 and I know it was
When I did the migration from Netview 5.1, I asked support if it was normal
should I be concerned about the size of my database ?
Thanks, Francois Le Hir
--------------------------------------------
Helmut, I have not seen that happen in years. I keep an eye out for them
And I will say it again, you should always be prepared to rediscover or
Cordially, Leslie A. Clark
helmut.schroeder.hs@bayer-ag.de@tkg.com on 04/17/2001 11:47:18 AM Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com> Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com To: nv-l@tkg.com
Hi, This is NV 6.01 in AIX 4.3.3:
OBJECT: 134765
OBJECT: 134766
I have no idea where they came from - ovtopofix changes nothing.
Helmut Schroeder _________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: AW: Rulesets - Filtering multiple Events [ND.Cerberus chec ked], Les Dickert |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: AW: Rulesets - Filtering multiple Events [ND.Cerberus chec ked], James_Shanks |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: Re: ovwdb: strange objects, helmut . schroeder . hs |
Next by Thread: | RE: Re: Re: ovwdb: strange objects, James_Shanks |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web