Re: NV-L Digest - 16 May 2001

nv-l

Re: NV-L Digest - 16 May 2001

from [danny]

To:	nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject:	Re: NV-L Digest - 16 May 2001
From:	danny@uk.ibm.com
Date:	Thu, 17 May 2001 13:43:06 +0100

--0__=z7ThDQvwskL3JDaCiTojFyqmxj9W8hH8WypJQvmjocwBEqAN3ebdrlRA
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline



Hi Jane

The routers do have loopback interfaces.

Why should the loopback interface be put in the seedfile, as opposed to the
interfaces I am currently using to discover the routers?

Cheers,

Danny

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: NV-L Digest - 16 May 2001, danny <= NV-L Digest - 16 May 2001, Blane_P_Robertson Re: NV-L Digest - 16 May 2001, Brian J Westberg

Previous by Date:	RE: Loading MIBs, John Mackney
Next by Date:	RE: Loading MIBs, James_Shanks
Previous by Thread:	RE: SysObjectID database, William . Stringfellow
Next by Thread:	NV-L Digest - 16 May 2001, Blane_P_Robertson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd