nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

incomplete discovery

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: incomplete discovery
From: "Herkert, Jim" <jim.herkert@gmacrfc.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 09:53:11 -0500
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
Box 1 running netview 5.1 for NT all nodes discovered correctly
Box 2 running netview 6.01 for NT only discovers a small number of nodes on
a switched subnet that is local. One subnet discovers 28 out of 190 the
other discovers 18 out of 230.
Same seed file as netview 5.
Same Snmp setting as netview 5
All subnet 2 hops or more are discovered correctly.
All setting in both versions seem to be the same.
Tried putting in the seed file the actual address of the segment to discover
and still did not discover the nodes.
Changed discover setting to use discover all networks (no seed file) and
still the same result.
 
Any ideal where to look for an incorrect setting??
 
 

Jim Herkert 
Enterprise Technology Services GMAC/RFC 
Phone 952 857 6827 
Cell 612 554 0227 
email jim.herkert@gmacrfc.com 

 
Box 1 running netview 5.1 for NT all nodes discovered correctly
Box 2 running netview 6.01 for NT only discovers a small number of nodes on a switched subnet that is local. One subnet discovers 28 out of 190 the other discovers 18 out of 230.
Same seed file as netview 5.
Same Snmp setting as netview 5
All subnet 2 hops or more are discovered correctly.
All setting in both versions seem to be the same.
Tried putting in the seed file the actual address of the segment to discover and still did not discover the nodes.
Changed discover setting to use discover all networks (no seed file) and still the same result.
 
Any ideal where to look for an incorrect setting??
 
 

Jim Herkert
Enterprise Technology Services GMAC/RFC
Phone 952 857 6827
Cell 612 554 0227
email jim.herkert@gmacrfc.com

 




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web