nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: incomplete discovery

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: Re: incomplete discovery
From: "Les Dickert" <lesdickert@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 15:44:59
You said "Same Snmp setting as netview 5",
but be sure that the 'ovsnmp.conf' file
has entries for all of the routers, sounds
like 6.01 can't do SNMP queries of the routers,
which would prevent complete discovery.

Les Dickert
Verisign Consulting



>From: "Herkert, Jim" <jim.herkert@gmacrfc.com>
>Reply-To: IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
>To: "'Netview list'" <nv-l@tkg.com>
>Subject: [NV-L] incomplete discovery
>Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 09:53:11 -0500
>
>Box 1 running netview 5.1 for NT all nodes discovered correctly
>Box 2 running netview 6.01 for NT only discovers a small number of nodes on
>a switched subnet that is local. One subnet discovers 28 out of 190 the
>other discovers 18 out of 230.
>Same seed file as netview 5.
>Same Snmp setting as netview 5
>All subnet 2 hops or more are discovered correctly.
>All setting in both versions seem to be the same.
>Tried putting in the seed file the actual address of the segment to 
>discover
>and still did not discover the nodes.
>Changed discover setting to use discover all networks (no seed file) and
>still the same result.
>
>Any ideal where to look for an incorrect setting??
>
>
>
>Jim Herkert
>Enterprise Technology Services GMAC/RFC
>Phone 952 857 6827
>Cell 612 554 0227
>email jim.herkert@gmacrfc.com
>
>

_________________________________________________________________


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web