nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: OV_Node_Down indications

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: RE: OV_Node_Down indications
From: "Haswell, Pete" <Pete.Haswell@ANICO.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 16:08:40 -0500
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
Thanks for the replys. These should give me plenty to "poke" around with. I
suspect it is a combination of issues.
Thanks again,
Pete
 
"We have met the enemy and they are us!"
Pogo - circa 1952

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Evans [mailto:wvevans@nc.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:54 PM
To: NV-L ListServ
Subject: Re: [NV-L] OV_Node_Down indications


The usual cause is network delay.  This could be delay in looking accessing
DNS or searching a hosts file, it could be network congestion, it could be
the device is too busy to answer SNMP or ICMP queries, anything which will
delay the status poll NetView does every 15 minutes (default on NT, 5
minutes default on Unix) and its retries.   
 
Netmon originated events DO NOT tell you the status of the device, they tell
you NETMON did not get the reply to his poll. If the device is really down
then it means the same thing.  If the network is slow it doesn't.  
 
Solutions:  
1. Check your name resolution - NetView hits it hard and a slow DNS is a
killer.  
2. Check for network congestion. 
3. Increase the timeouts for status polling.  See page 151 of the NetView NT
User's Guide.  
4. Find out about using the rulesets which come with NetView NT.  There is
one called Downandnotupinten.rs which may do what you want.  See page 105 of
the User's Guide.  
 
Good luck.  
 
 -- 
Bill Evans  --  Consultant in Enterprise Systems Management
reply-to: wvevans@prodigy.net <mailto:wvevans@prodigy.net>   (or
Bill_Evans@sra.com <mailto:Bill_Evans@sra.com> ) 
Phone: 919-696-7513 
Send short text messages to 9196967513@messaging.sprintpcs.com
<mailto:9196967513@messaging.sprintpcs.com>  
 
Haswell, Pete wrote:
 
> Hi List,
> 
> We have Netview for NT 6.0.2 configured to generate OV_Node_Down/Up events
> to TEC. We seem to get a high number of erroneous events generated. Mot of
> the time the OV_Node_Up is generated within a short period of time. Any
> ideas what causes this?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Pete
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
<http://www.tkg.com/nv-l> 
> .
> 
> 
 

 

Thanks for the replys. These should give me plenty to "poke" around with. I suspect it is a combination of issues.
Thanks again,
Pete
 
"We have met the enemy and they are us!"
Pogo - circa 1952
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Evans [mailto:wvevans@nc.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:54 PM
To: NV-L ListServ
Subject: Re: [NV-L] OV_Node_Down indications

The usual cause is network delay.  This could be delay in looking accessing DNS or searching a hosts file, it could be network congestion, it could be the device is too busy to answer SNMP or ICMP queries, anything which will delay the status poll NetView does every 15 minutes (default on NT, 5 minutes default on Unix) and its retries.  
 
Netmon originated events DO NOT tell you the status of the device, they tell you NETMON did not get the reply to his poll. If the device is really down then it means the same thing.  If the network is slow it doesn't. 
 
Solutions: 
1. Check your name resolution - NetView hits it hard and a slow DNS is a killer. 
2. Check for network congestion.
3. Increase the timeouts for status polling.  See page 151 of the NetView NT User's Guide. 
4. Find out about using the rulesets which come with NetView NT.  There is one called Downandnotupinten.rs which may do what you want.  See page 105 of the User's Guide. 
 
Good luck. 
 
 --
Bill Evans  --  Consultant in Enterprise Systems Management
reply-to: wvevans@prodigy.net  (or Bill_Evans@sra.com)
Phone: 919-696-7513
Send short text messages to 9196967513@messaging.sprintpcs.com
 
Haswell, Pete wrote:
 
> Hi List,
>
> We have Netview for NT 6.0.2 configured to generate OV_Node_Down/Up events
> to TEC. We seem to get a high number of erroneous events generated. Mot of
> the time the OV_Node_Up is generated within a short period of time. Any
> ideas what causes this?
>
> Thanks
>
> Pete
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> .
>
>
 

 




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web