nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: RE: Netview Enhancements

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: RE: RE: Netview Enhancements
From: Dean Sullinger <DSullinger@dot.state.az.us>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 07:07:02 -0700
Get the groups created so those who want to join can...

Let's get it kicked off.

Once a list apears to be forming, than Scott can keep a "top 10" running for
eveyone to see.  Yahoo eGroups allows you to store files within the group...
The "top 10" could be kept there for all to see.


-----Original Message-----
From: Barr, Scott [mailto:Scott_Barr@csgsystems.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:43 PM
To: IBM NetView Discussion
Subject: RE: [NV-L] RE: Netview Enhancements


Grant, thats not a bad idea, but I thought using a board for each of the
topics would allow some discussion. What some folks might view as an
enhancment others may view as a step backward. We need conversation (re:
flamewar) on each topic to shake out the best suggestions. If folks want to
send me the enhancment stuff that is fine, but I would just post it on each
of the appropriate boards and let the disscusion (re: argument) begin. When
the group reaches consensus (re: begs for mercy) we would produce a document
with the final enhancment recommendation. 

Anyone else have any thoughts?



-----Original Message-----
From: Grant Meynell [mailto:Grant_Meynell@westpactrust.co.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:34 PM
To: nv-l@tkg.com
Subject: [NV-L] RE: Netview Enhancements


I would hazard a guess at this Mailing List being the largest "un-official"
Netview User Group around. We need to organise ourselves so that our voice
is heard when it comes to enhancements to this product.

If its ok with Scott Barr (since he's already volunteered), can everybody on
the list forwards their top 5 enhancements to him. (I would do it, but being
an IBMer... probably better to have someone independant do it).

Scott could then correlate the enhancements and provide a top 10 list, along
with the number of requestees for each enhancement. Is this ok with you
Scott?

I suggest that we keep Unix / NT enhancements separate, given the
differences betwen the products.

As for David Tremblay's comment about it being in IBM's best interest to
have a User group assist in the evolution of the product, that is very true,
but surely it is even more important for the User's of the product to have
their say?

Grant Meynell
Systems Programmer
Strategic Outsourcing
IBM (NZ) Ltd.

Telephone: +64 4 576 9768 extn. 9768
Facsimile: +64 4 576 5808 extn. 5808
e-mail: grant_meynell@westpactrust.co.nz
     gmeynell@nz1.ibm.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The contents of this e-mail are confidential.
If you have received this communication by mistake,
please advise the sender immediately and delete the message and any
attachments. The views expressed in this e-mail are not necessarily the
views of Westpac Banking Corporation. Westpac Banking Corporation is
incorporated in New South Wales, Australia.
---------------------------------------------------------------------


_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: RE: Netview Enhancements, Dean Sullinger <=

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web