nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RV: RV: NV_L What should I use Netview or Cisco Works ? bo th

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: RV: RV: NV_L What should I use Netview or Cisco Works ? bo th
From: "Enriquez Bolio,C-Raul,MEXICO,INFO" <C-Raul.Enriquez@MX.NESTLE.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 07:40:21 -0700
ok, I'm monitoring WAN links only.

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De:   Allie M Tate [SMTP:allie@lsu.edu]
> Enviado el:   Viernes 26 de Octubre de 2001 10:11 AM
> Para: IBM NetView Discussion
> Asunto:       Re: RV: [NV-L] NV_L What should I use Netview or Cisco Works
> ? both
> 
> 
> However - as I was just reminded in an earlier post - you cannot collect
> valid data for gig interfaces because of the use of 64 bit counters and
> NetView's inability to handle this.  Unless someone corrects me, you can't
> monitor bandwidth utilization for any devices that use 64 bit counters.
> 
> Allie
> 
> 
>  
> 
>                     "Enriquez
> 
>                     Bolio,C-Raul,MEXICO,I        To:     "'Netview List'"
> <nv-l@tkg.com>                                           
>                     NFO"                         cc:     (bcc: Allie M
> Tate/allie/LSU)                                             
>                     <C-Raul.Enriquez@MX.N        Subject:     RV: [NV-L]
> NV_L What should I use Netview or Cisco Works ? both      
>                     ESTLE.com>
> 
>                     Sent by:
> 
>                     owner-nv-l@tkg.com
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>                     10/26/2001 08:54 AM
> 
>                     Please respond to IBM
> 
>                     NetView Discussion
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hello Christian:
> 
> Currently I'm using Netview for monitoring bandwidth and it works OK. You
> only have to collect IfInOctects and IfOutOctects information and create
> an
> expression to get the %.
> 
> Saludos.
> 
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De:     chuberdeau@avdl.com [SMTP:chuberdeau@avdl.com]
> > Enviado el:  Viernes 26 de Octubre de 2001 9:26 AM
> > Para:   IBM NetView Discussion
> > Asunto: Re: [NV-L] NV_L What should I use Netview or Cisco Works ?
> > both
> >
> > We do use mrtg for historique but can we configure mrtg to send snmp
> trap.
> > I dont think so.
> >
> > So I do have both system. but the version of Cisco Works I have does not
> > include monitoring.
> >
> > Does anybody use netview for monitoring bandwidth or cpu ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Christian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Gavin Newman" <NEWMANGJ@banksa.com.au>@tkg.com le 2001-10-25 20:19:18
> >
> > Veuillez répondre à IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
> >
> > Envoyé par :   owner-nv-l@tkg.com
> >
> >
> > Pour :    <nv-l@tkg.com>
> > cc :
> >
> > Objet :   Re: [NV-L] NV_L What should I use Netview or Cisco Works ?
> > both
> >
> >
> > Have you considered MRTG for your bandwidth monitoring?
> >
> > >>> chuberdeau@avdl.com 25/10/2001 03:34:52 >>>
> > Hi  Everybody,
> >
> >      I have to do monitoring of cisco's equipment and telecommunication
> > line bandwidth.
> >
> > Can I do it only with netview or should I purchase cisco works
> > "CWLMS-2.0".
> >
> > That what I already saw or understand is if something failed on the
> cisco
> > router
> > for example one power supply it will send a snmp trap to my console and
> > the
> > mib
> > allow me to interpret the message.
> >
> > About bandwidth monitoring or CPU I think I have to do a collection and
> > set
> > some threshold.
> >
> > Can someone tell me if I m wrong ... or on the wrong track...
> >
> > Thank you very much
> >
> > Christian Huberdeau
> > Management Tools
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________________
> > NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> >
> >
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> >    *****   IMPORTANT INFORMATION    *****
> > This document should be read only by those persons to whom
> > it is addressed and its content is not intended for use by
> > any other persons. If you have received this message in
> > error, please notify us immediately. Please also destroy and
> > delete the message from your computer. Any unauthorised form
> > of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited.
> > Bank SA is not liable for the proper and complete transmission
> > of the information contained in this communication, nor for any
> > delay in its receipt.
> > **********************************************************************
> >
> _________________________________________________________________________
> > NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________________
> > NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> 
> 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RV: RV: NV_L What should I use Netview or Cisco Works ? bo th, Enriquez Bolio,C-Raul,MEXICO,INFO <=

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web