Global Acknowledgement is documented in the Release Notes for 6.0.2.
That is the first release where it is available, so it appears in no other
document.
James Shanks
Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
"Allison,
Jason To: "'IBM NetView Discussion'"
<nv-l@tkg.com>
(JALLISON)" cc:
<JALLISON@arin Subject: RE: [NV-L] Acknowledging
c.com>
Sent by:
owner-nv-l@tkg
.com
11/27/01 03:50
PM
Please respond
to IBM NetView
Discussion
I would be interested in hearing more about this.
Thanks,
Jason
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Bursik [mailto:tivoliesm@HOTMAIL.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:50 PM
To: nv-l@tkg.com
Subject: RE: [NV-L] Acknowledging
Global Acknowlege Mode? I have searched the Administrators Guide and didn't
see this one. How do you do this?
Scott
>From: "Ingersoll, Robert" <bob.ingersoll@usaa.com>
>Reply-To: IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
>To: "'IBM NetView Discussion'" <nv-l@tkg.com>
>Subject: RE: [NV-L] Acknowledging
>Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:49:32 -0600
>
>As designed at 5.1.3. Upgrade to 6.0.2 or better and use global
>Acknowledge
>mode. It will do what you want.
>
>
>--
>Bob Ingersoll
>USAA Information Technology Company (ITCO)
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Allison, Jason (JALLISON) [mailto:JALLISON@arinc.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:34 PM
>To: 'nv-l@tkg.com'
>Subject: [NV-L] Acknowledging
>
>
>AIX 4.3.3 - Netview 5.1.3
>
>We are now instructing our operators to acknowledge container symbols when
>there is a failure that is known. This works fine when we have one
>instance
>of 'netview' running. Acknowledging works as expected. We have come
>across
>some problems when bringing up another instance of 'netview' (TME10 GUI).
>The background is we have a second AIX box that will remotely shell into
>the
>first box already running an instance of 'netview'. We will bring up this
>second instance of TME10 as a read-only map, which has worked fine for
some
>time. Our problem is that the second instance of the map does not seems
to
>synchronize the currently acknowledged containers, nor if I acknowledge a
>container while both are up do they then sync.
>
>My question(s) are:
>
>- Is this 'as designed'?
>
>- If so, why? Pros/Cons. Why is this desirable?
>
>- Can both maps be synced up?
>
>- What are my options?
>
>
>
>Hopefully I am not missing any information,
>Thanks for your time,
>
>
>Jason Allison
>_________________________________________________________________________
>NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
>_________________________________________________________________________
>NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
|