To: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] RE MIB & snmpcollect |
From: | "James Shanks" <jshanks@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Wed, 23 Jan 2002 09:16:02 -0500 |
I would use GAUGE. If the MIB that this OID came from were converted from SNMP V2 to SNMP V1, then the type would be given as GAUGE. And if you had such a MIB, that's how xnmcollect would put it into snmpCol.conf. SNMP V1 is what snmpCollect understands. The only real difference between GAUGE and GAUGE32 is the size of the value returned, and I believe that snmpCollect has big enough buffers that this does not matter. James Shanks Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
Sorry again Paul, But I have to activate the new variable into the file (snmpCol.conf) like GAUGE32 or GAUGE; for instance: Option 1: MIB .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.5 cpmCPUTotal5min units GAUGE32 R C ROUTER_A 120 0.000000 0.000000 xA s 58720263 ALL - or on the oder hand: Option 2: MIB .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.5 cpmCPUTotal5min units GAUGE R C ROUTER_A 120 0.000000 0.000000 xA s 58720263 ALL - What option I have to choose? Thanks: Jose --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com For additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com *NOTE* This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group help line at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] LRF files, James Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [nv-l] Locale Problem, Good, Michael |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] RE MIB & snmpcollect, jmfrancoz |
Next by Thread: | [nv-l] LRF files, jmfrancoz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web