nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] HSRP Situation

To: "'Barr, Scott'" <Scott_Barr@csgsystems.com>
Subject: RE: [nv-l] HSRP Situation
From: "sabirali sama" <sabirali.sama@elyzium.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 11:59:23 -0000
Cc: <nv-l@lists.tivoli.com>
Reply-to: <sabirali.sama@elyzium.co.uk>
 
Thanks for your reply Scott, I tried modifying the ovsuf file directly after making a copy of it, but seem to get the following error message:
 
C:\usr\ov\bin\ovspmd.exe: /usr/OV/conf/ovsuf: object manager polld: dependency OVs_YES_START not found
C:\usr\ov\bin\ovspmd.exe: /usr/OV/conf/ovsuf: object manager polld: dependency OVs_YES_START not found
C:\usr\ov\bin\ovspmd.exe: /usr/OV/conf/ovsuf: object manager snmpserver: dependency ÿ?+ not found
C:\usr\ov\bin\ovspmd.exe: /usr/OV/conf/ovsuf: object manager snmpserver: dependency ÿ?+ not found
Done
 
I have also tried modifying the netmon.lrf file but seem to get the same error message?
 
How do I add the -V option ?
 
Many thanks,
Sabirali
-----Original Message-----
From: Barr, Scott [mailto:Scott_Barr@csgsystems.com]
Sent: 08 February 2002 19:20
To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] HSRP Situation

Check out your netmon definition in /usr/OV/conf/ovsuf and see if it contains the -V (capital V) option. This is for the automatic discovery of all HSRP addresses. I have had NO HSRP problems since this flag was turned on.
-----Original Message-----
From: sabirali sama [mailto:sabirali.sama@elyzium.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 1:05 PM
To: lclark@us.ibm.com; 'Jane Curry'
Cc: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: [nv-l] HSRP Situation

Dear All,
 
I have been following the HSRP thread on the forums and was am hoping that anyone can please help..
 
We have implemented NetView 7.1  and have a router that is HSRP enabled the configuration is as follows:
 
CISCO 4500 Router
 
172.16.1.1 default gateway which is also a virtual ip address used by HSRP
172.16.1.2
172.16.1.3
 
We can snapback the above ip addresses and ping them also.
 
The problem that we see is that 172.16.1.2 appears on the map but 172.16.1.3 does not.
 
We have tried to manually add the node (172.16.1.3) to the map this works for a while and then is deleted after two minutes. These ip address have subnet masks of 255.255.255.192, which I am not sure is the problem - I have passed the ip addresses through an ip calculator and the subnet seems to be inconsistent or illegal as our Network administrator puts it.
 
The other interesting issue is that we have made entries in the netmon.seed file i.e %172.16.1.1, %172.16.1.2 and %172.16.1.3 and restarted netmon this has had no effect of discovering 172.16.1.3.
 
When I perform a snmpwalk on 172.16.1.1 I do not get much information back about 30 fields are returned, however when I do the snmpwalk on 172.16.1.2 I get pages of information back and when I do the same for 172.16.1.3 I only get two fields back (Selection Name and IP Hostname).
 
I have ran an ovtopofix -a to remove any inconsistencies.
 
The network administrator is certain that 172.16.1.3 and 172.16.1.2 and 172.16.1.1 we appearing on the map when NetView 5.1 was installed,
 
Can you please advise me, thanks in advance.
 

Sabirali Sama

Tivoli Certified
 
Direct Line +44 7971 031637
Fax:          0870  8314306
 
Training & Enterprise Management Consultancy
 
Elyzium Limited
 

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

The information transmitted in this message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 

 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web