To: | "Ray Westphal" <westphal@accessus.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | impact of tracing (was: Re: [nv-l] No events displayed) |
From: | netview@toddh.net (Todd H.) |
Date: | 06 Mar 2002 21:54:55 -0600 |
Cc: | "Scott Bursik" <tivoliesm@hotmail.com>, <nv-l@lists.tivoli.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
"Ray Westphal" <westphal@accessus.net> writes: > Hello Scott, > > If you have tracing enabled on trapd daemon, run the trapd -T > command to start a trace. (See the serversetup trapd configuration.) > Wait about 30 seconds and run the command again to stop the > trace. Usually the trace will dump to /usr/OV/log/trapd.trace. Edit Speaking of tracing--how much overhead does it put on the NetView processes does daemon tracing add? Is it simply out the question to run with it on? If so, how much additional delay would one expect? Granted, disk space is a concern, but in terms of overall server performance? I'm just trying to get a sense of whether the option is so invasive that it'll slow everything down dramatically. -- Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [nv-l] No events displayed, Ray Westphal |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [nv-l] Netview On Solaris, Vikas Kumar Gupta |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] What is the latest version of framework which works with TIPN?, "문현승" |
Next by Thread: | RE: impact of tracing (was: Re: [nv-l] No events displayed), Ray Westphal |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web