Re: [nv-l] costs of automatic actions vs. ruleset

[netview@toddh.net (Todd H.)]

"Stephen Hochstetler" <shochste@us.ibm.com> writes:

> 2.  For the ruleset  that is called to forward events to TEC, it should
> have absolutely NO action blocks in that ruleset.

Hi Stephen, 

Could you share your reasoning/experience that lead to this
suggestion?  (nervously considers all the action nodes in my ruleset)

> 3.  Any ruleset that has action blocks should be called from
> ESE.automation.   This ruleset should have a default box of BLOCK...and
> have absolutely no FORWARD EVENT blocks.   All event streams should end in
> a BLOCK box after all actions have taken place.

-- 
Todd H.
http://www.toddh.net/