To: | <nv-l@lists.tivoli.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [nv-l] snmpCollect bandwidth on NT? |
From: | "Karl Prinelle" <Karl.Prinelle@elyzium.co.uk> |
Date: | Sat, 14 Sep 2002 12:46:16 +0100 |
Reply-to: | <Karl.Prinelle@elyzium.co.uk> |
Hi
list,
NV: 7.1.2, w2k
sp2. 1way ~1.7Ghz cpu, 1Gb ram
I've been tracing my
snmpcollect & I keep getting defferred collections for devices. I'm
(trying to) collect 3 mib values (2 of them collect "all instances" from the
device, but there are only up to 4 instances) from about 40 devices with a
10 min polling interval. I've noticed that some devices are getting up to
7-8 consecutive deferrals.
The log shows NV
making about 10-15 polls and defferring the rest. I've adjusted down the
retry interval to be 1 min (impatient testing) and thinking that having
a retry less than the polling interval will give it a chance to catch up
within the interval. This seems to have helped it reduce the number of
consecutive defferrals, but I still get a fair few and it's likely I will need
to increse the number of collections beyond the simple ones I'm grabbing
now.
Is there a planning
tool/guideline/general practice about how many collections can be made in what
interval on w2k? Is it an OS thing? The machine isn't a
multi-processor (didn't think NV on NT would make use of it). There is
nothing else running on this machine either.
thanks in
advance.
Karl
Karl Prinelle
Tivoli Certified
Consultant
Elyzium Ltd
Enterprise Systems Management
Consultants
Mobile: +44 (0)7813 189198
Email: Karl.Prinelle@elyzium.co.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elyzium Disclaimer: This email transmission is confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or disseminate the information, or take any action in reliance of it. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of any organisation or employer. If you have received this message in error, do not open any attachment but please notify the sender (above) deleting this message from your system. Please rely on your own virus check no responsibility is taken by the sender for any damage rising out of any bug or virus infection. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] RULSET ? Query Database Field, James Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [nv-l] SNMP on non-standard ports, D T |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] RULSET ? Query Database Field, Jeffrey G. Fitzwater |
Next by Thread: | [nv-l] SNMP on non-standard ports, D T |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web