nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RES: [nv-l] RFI Router marginal?

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: RES: [nv-l] RFI Router marginal?
From: Marcos Antonio Pezzutti Filho <pezzutti@banespa.com.br>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 19:35:51 -0300
Hi James,

We experienced this kind of problem here.
We´ve noticed that when setting a node unmanaged, in the database it isn´t
really unmanaged. It was necessary to run ovtopofix to set the right status.
We don´t know if this is a problem or not.

-----Mensagem original-----
De: James Brunke [mailto:jbrunke@ctsgi.com] 
Enviada em: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 17:19
Para: 'Leslie Clark'; nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Assunto: RE: [nv-l] RFI Router marginal?


Leslie-

An ovobjprint shows the router as Marginal and the interface which should be
Unmanaged as Critical.  When I look at the map, the interface "looks"
unmanaged (it is brown and when I right click on it, my options include
Manage).  If I Manage then Unmanage the interface on the map, the Router Up
message immediately is issued and the IP status of the
interface in the ovobjprint is now Unmanaged.   

I've got a problem opened with support on this one, I'll let you know how it
comes out...

Thanks, Jim

James Brunke 
Crystal Technology Solutions Group 
jbrunke@ctsgi.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: Leslie Clark [mailto:lclark@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:25 AM
To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] RFI Router marginal?



Yes, I believe it should, at least in passing. Possible there is a Router Up
that follows it. Possibly it is Log Only? Or possibly that interface is
still managed somewhere in some other map? Try running ovmapcount -a to see
if there is a discrepancy in the number of maps the things are managed in.
I find Router Marginal to be ambiguous so I don't use it in rulesets,
generally.

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Detroit


 

                      "James Brunke"

                      <jbrunke@ctsgi.co        To:
<nv-l@lists.tivoli.com>                                              
                      m>                       cc:

                                               Subject:  [nv-l] RFI
Router marginal?                                          
                      11/04/2002 10:31

                      AM

 

 




Netview V7.1.2 on Windows 2K.

I have downstream routers with inactive interfaces I have unmanaged in
Netview.  When a primary upstream router goes down, RFI does it's job and
reports the downstream routers Unreachable and the upstream router either
marginal or down.  But when the upstream router comes back up, Netview is
reporting the downstream routers as Router marginal.  Since all of the
managed interfaces are up, shouldn't it be reporting Router up?

Is this a bug?

Thanks, Jim

James Brunke
Crystal Technology Solutions Group
Email: jbrunke@ctsgi.com



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com
For additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com

*NOTE*
This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate
assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group help line
at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548)







---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com
For additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com

*NOTE*
This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate
assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group help line
at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548)




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com
For additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com

*NOTE*
This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate
assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group help line
at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548)
"Essa  mensagem é  destinada  exclusivamente ao seu destinatário e pode 
 conter informações confidenciais, protegidas por sigilo profissional ou 
cuja  divulgação  seja  proibida por  lei. O uso não autorizado de tais 
informações  é   proibido  e  está   sujeito  às  penalidades cabíveis. 
 

This message is intended exclusively for its addressee and may  contain 
 information   that   is  confidential,  protected  by   a  professional 
privilege or which disclosure is prohibited by law. Unauthorized use of 
 such information is prohibited and subject to applicable penalties." 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web