To: | "'Cowan, Christopher'" <Christopher_Cowan@sra.com>, "'nv-l@lists.tivoli.com'" <nv-l@lists.tivoli.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [nv-l] HACMP vs. backup managers |
From: | "Davis, Donald" <donald.davis@firstcitizens.com> |
Date: | Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:05:10 -0500 |
Delivered-to: | mailing list nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:59:06 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.tivoli.com> |
List-subscribe: | <mailto:nv-l-subscribe@lists.tivoli.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com> |
Mailing-list: | contact nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com; run by ezmlm |
Chris,
2. There is no way to allow specific interfaces to remain unmanaged when a failover occurs.
3. You did mention the MLM issue.
Don Davis -----Original Message-----
I'll be the first to admit that it has been over 6 years since I used the
It worked flawlessly for me, and even migrated over my MLMs. The only
I guess I'm just curious, and wonder if people don't know about the feature,
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE*
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] SNMPv2c, John Bruer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [nv-l] Support for AIX 5.2, Jane Curry |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] SNMPv2c, Cowan, Christopher |
Next by Thread: | [nv-l] HACMP vs. backup managers, Cowan, Christopher |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web