To: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] RFI : meaning of "Interface has no connectivity in unreachable region" ? |
From: | "Philippe Menard" <PME@fr.ibm.com> |
Date: | Fri, 8 Aug 2003 20:13:43 +0200 |
Cc: | pstroud@bellsouth.net |
Delivered-to: | mailing list nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
Delivery-date: | Fri, 08 Aug 2003 19:14:17 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.tivoli.com> |
List-subscribe: | <mailto:nv-l-subscribe@lists.tivoli.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com> |
Mailing-list: | contact nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com; run by ezmlm |
I think I'm seeing the light. Do you agree with - "Interface has no connectivity in unreachable region" means "Interface is unreachable" i.e. "Interface in unknown state" - "Interface down" (a fact) should have higher priority than "Interface unreachable" (no information) - the reason the interface is unreachable is that other (router) interfaces are down (high priority !) Philippe. - - - Philippe MÉNARD Networking Delivery Support Center Mail : pme@fr.ibm.com Phone : +33 (0)4 92 11 48 69 Fax : +33 (0)4 93 24 49 07
At that point, the device is not "down", it is acutally unreachable, NetView knows this so it changes the status from "down" to "unreachable". For this to happen a trap must be generated and processed. This will update the status in the database. Paul On Friday 08 August 2003 13:32, Philippe Menard wrote: > Stephen, > > I know the purpose of RFI and I see we share the same definition of an > unreachable region. > > What I can't understand is : once a region is unreachable, what additional > information is provided > by the "Interface has no connectivity in unreachable region" event ? Don't > we already know > that all the interfaces connected to this region are down ? Am I missing > something obvious ? > > Best regards, > Philippe. > > - - - > > Philippe MÉNARD > Networking Delivery Support Center > Mail : pme@fr.ibm.com > Phone : +33 (0)4 92 11 48 69 > Fax : +33 (0)4 93 24 49 07 > > > > > > > Stephen Hochstetler/Austin/IBM@IBMUS > 08/08/2003 19:05 > > > To: Philippe Menard/France/Contr/IBM@IBMFR, > nv-l@lists.tivoli.com cc: > Subject: Re: [nv-l] RFI : meaning of "Interface has no > connectivity in unreachable region" ? > > > > > > > > I am going to take a shot at this....and let Paul or someone else let me > know if this is wrong. RFI is suppose to reduce the number of > IBM_NVIDWN_EV being send when a whole subnet is not pingable by NetView. > How does NetView know this....simply by NetView knowing all the router > interfaces in a particular subnet. When NetView sees all the Router > interfaces down in a single subnet, NetView is smart enough to know it > will > not be able to ping any computers in that subnet...so it stops polling the > computers. But it still pings the router interfaces waiting for them to > come back up. > > Case 1: The interface is down. No known impact to other > nodes/interfaces is known. If this is from a router, then NetView must > be > able to ping other router interfaces in that subnet yet. > > Case 2: The interface is down. Since NetView is suppose to stop pinging > computers in an unreachable region, then this must be coming from the > router interface that signifies that ALL router interfaces are down in > that > subnet (unreachable region). I would say that this reported "problem" > should have higher priority than case 1, since a whole region of the > network is affected. > > > > > Stephen Hochstetler shochste@us.ibm.com > International Technical Support Organization at IBM > Office - 512-838-6198 (t/l 678) FAX - 512-838-6931 > http://www.redbooks.ibm.com > > |---------+----------------------------> > | > | | "Philippe Menard"| > | | <PME@fr.ibm.com> | > | | > | | 08/08/2003 11:50 | > | | AM | > | > |---------+----------------------------> > | > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >------------------------------------| > > > | To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com | > | cc: | > | Subject: [nv-l] RFI : meaning of "Interface has no connectivity > > in unreachable region" ? | > > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >------------------------------------| > > All, > > NV 7.1.3, AIX 4.3.3 > > I have realized that the IBM_NVIDWN_EV event (EID = nv6000, specific = > 58916867) is now used in (at least) two cases : > 1- the usual Interface Down event with a description such as "Interface > Ethernet0 down." > 2- the RFI event with a description such as "Interface Ethernet0 has no > connectivity in unreachable region" > > Please could someone explain the meaning of the second event. > Is it OK to consider this event as a plain "Interface Down" event ? (as > suggested by the reuse of the trap) > > Best regards, > Philippe. > > - - - > > Philippe MÉNARD > Networking Delivery Support Center > Mail : pme@fr.ibm.com > Phone : +33 (0)4 92 11 48 69 > Fax : +33 (0)4 93 24 49 07 > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com > For additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com > > *NOTE* > This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate > assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group > help line at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] SAN Disk Utilization, CMazon |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] RFI : meaning of "Interface has no connectivity in unreachable region" ?, Stephen Hochstetler |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] RFI : meaning of "Interface has no connectivity in unreachable region" ?, Philippe Menard |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] RFI : meaning of "Interface has no connectivity in unreachable region" ?, Stephen Hochstetler |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web