nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] Rulesets / Alerting

To: "'nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com'" <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Rulesets / Alerting
From: Brian Kraftchick <Brian.Kraftchick@odfl.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:07:01 -0400
Delivery-date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 18:16:47 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l-digest@lists.us.ibm.com
In what direction should I go to learn how to correlate events on the NetView server vs. doing so in TEC.  I'd certainly prefer to keep TEC as clean as possible....I wasn't aware of any ability to do correlation at the NetView level.
-----Original Message-----
From: Fernandez, Rick [mailto:Richard.Fernandez@msfc.nasa.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 12:55 PM
To: 'nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com'
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Rulesets / Alerting

We use TEC for alerts but we first correlate the events on the NetView server then forward to TEC for additional correlation.
 
 
 

Thank You!

Rick Fernandez
Phone: 256-544-5106
Computer Science Corporation
Marshall Space Flight Center

 


From: CMazon@commercebankfl.com [mailto:CMazon@commercebankfl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 11:46 AM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: [nv-l] Rulesets / Alerting


Hi List,

I was trying to get a feel from how many out there use Netview by itself for alerting and event correlation or if they use TEC?


Carlos
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web