| To: | <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [nv-l] Authentication Failure Trap Argument interpretation |
| From: | "Treptow, Craig" <Treptow.Craig@principal.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:12:27 -0500 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 23 Oct 2003 14:20:12 +0100 |
| Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
| Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
| Sender: | owner-nv-l-digest@lists.us.ibm.com |
| Thread-index: | AcOYuBBhT9QdJuydQy6kvwjrz61wVAArtahQ |
| Thread-topic: | [nv-l] Authentication Failure Trap Argument interpretation |
|
Well, if that's the trap hex, it just says
"OCTET STRING" (x04) and not "IP ADDRESS" (x40)
04 04 a2 83 26 3d means "octet string of 4 bytes" with that data. We would expect an IP Address to be 40 04 a2 83 26 3d I cannot answer why your other tools seem to know that this is meant as an IP Address. That's not what it says. [Treptow, Craig] I don't think I made myself clear. None of the tools interpret it as an IP address. Are you saying then that Cisco should be sending this
argument with a type of x40, instead of x04?
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Ruleset Question, Paul Stroud |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Fw: [nv-l] NV 7.1.4 and TEC forwarding / Correlation Gateway, Christopher Haynes |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Authentication Failure Trap Argument interpretation, Joe Fernandez |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Authentication Failure Trap Argument interpretation, James Shanks |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web