nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [nv-l] Different Link Address Messages

To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Different Link Address Messages
From: Leslie Clark <lclark@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:56:27 -0500
Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 20:03:17 +0000
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

The choices for 'Ring-bit storage swapping flag' are none, ignore, and report. Set it to ignore.

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Detroit



"Georg Gangl" <Georg.Gangl@brz.gv.at>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

11/11/2003 09:55 AM
Please respond to nv-l

       
        To:        <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
        cc:        
        Subject:        [nv-l] Different Link Address Messages



Hi  Group members,

We are running the UNIX version of NetView 7.1.3 with FixLevels
NVS(C)7130 and get a lot of Traps of the type "Host A reported different
Link Address than obtained from Host B by SNMP" (Host A and Host B are
Cisco Switches/Routers).
According to the solution described in the nv-l mail from Mr. Oliver
Bruchhauser on 2 April 2003, we changed the Netmon setting to "Ignore
source route bit in physical address" to "yes". But unfortunately, this
did not solve our problem. We are still flooded with "Different Link
Address" Traps.
Is there anything we can do in addtion to it ?

Thank you very much for any help.

Cordially,

Georg Gangl

_____________________________
Ing. Georg Gangl
Bundesrechenzentrum Ges.m.b.H.
Hintere Zollamtsstrasse 4
A-1033 Wien
Gruppe I-PS-NW Netzwerke
Tel.:  00 43 (1) 711 23 - 3891 DW
Fax.: 00 43 (1) 711 23 - 3897 DW
mailto:Georg.Gangl@brz.gv.at
--------------------------------------------------



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web