To: | "'nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com'" <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [nv-l] netmon option |
From: | JAMES Robin <robin.james@eurocontrol.int> |
Date: | Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:40:49 +0100 |
Delivery-date: | Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:50:30 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Thanks
for the tip Leslie.
netmon.trace contains the line "**Tivoli Netview Event Suppression
enabled" when -K1 is used and does not have this trace with
-K0.
Robin
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Leslie Clark Sent: Thursday 27 November 2003 17:54 To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [nv-l] netmon option I believe in V6, when you start netmon, it writes a record in /usr/OV/log/netmon.trace that indicates the status of RFI. It may call it by some other name. And it may only do it when it is enabled. I THINK it does not matter if there is a space or not. Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking Detroit
I am trying to convince myself that I have setup a new netmon option correctly. I want to use the option -K0 to switch off RFI. I was not sure whether to use -K0 or -K 0. Both were accepted. Should either method work? I tried a bad value -K99 (because the release notes say the value can be 0 or 1 or 2) but it was accepted which is why I am asking how can I be sure netmon is using the new -K0 option successfully. There is no information about options written to netmon.trace as far as I can see. Perhaps the -K option is a mask which is why it takes bigger values, anyone know? Using Netview 6.0.3 on Digital UNIX. Regards Robin ____ This message and any files transmitted with it are legally privileged and intended for the sole use of the individual(s) or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by reply and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Any unauthorised use or disclosure of the content of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Nothing in this e-mail message amounts to a contractual or legal commitment on the part of EUROCONTROL unless it is confirmed by appropriately signed hard copy. Any views expressed in this message are those of the sender. ____ This message and any files transmitted with it are legally privileged and intended for the sole use of the individual(s) or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by reply and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Any unauthorised use or disclosure of the content of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Nothing in this e-mail message amounts to a contractual or legal commitment on the part of EUROCONTROL unless it is confirmed by appropriately signed hard copy. Any views expressed in this message are those of the sender. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l] Some nodes not getting discovered, John F |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Setting Up treshold for SNMP V2 MIBS, Jane Curry |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] netmon option, Leslie Clark |
Next by Thread: | [nv-l] Setting Up treshold for SNMP V2 MIBS, Meyos Yemveng |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web