To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] [nvl] Netview 7.1.4 WEP question |
From: | Gareth Holl <gholl@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Tue, 2 Dec 2003 17:56:38 -0500 |
Cc: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com, owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Delivery-date: | Tue, 02 Dec 2003 23:15:20 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <OFE503D4DD.9F38424E-ON05256DF0.007A216E-05256DF0.007AA3C3@orgbc.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
The availability data is only at a "Node" level. Besides this, the only other non-node type information stored in the Availabililty database are Smartset names. I'm assuming (but have not tested) that your interfaces smartset probably appears in the Smartset table of the Availability database (if configured to be included via the tdwdaemon.properties) but it would have no membership information since it has no nodes. Gareth Holl Staff Software Engineer gholl@us.ibm.com IBM Software Group - Tivoli Brand Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Hi List: NV 7.1.4 under RHAS 2.1 We have enabled tdwdaemon, and the availability information from the Routers smartset goes to the db2 database correctly, but the info from a Interfaces smartset does not appear on the database. is this the correct behavior? can tdwdaemon capture interfaces availability info? Regards, Ricardo Durán NSM Analyst Bancolombia |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l] [nvl] Netview 7.1.4 WEP question, RDURAN |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: RE: [nv-l] Move (cut/paste) Locations in IP-Internet, Leslie Clark |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] [nvl] Netview 7.1.4 WEP question, RDURAN |
Next by Thread: | [nv-l] Unknown trap from Nortel BayStack 450, Gehrig, Winfried |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web