To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Netviewd and ipmap |
From: | Paul <pstroud@bellsouth.net> |
Date: | Wed, 07 Jan 2004 17:39:50 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 07 Jan 2004 22:54:40 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <077A7BB7EF7DB04E81162552C1D47F544FB011@s1ffcd2.ba.ssa.gov> |
References: | <077A7BB7EF7DB04E81162552C1D47F544FB011@s1ffcd2.ba.ssa.gov> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031014 Thunderbird/0.3 |
Fawad, The relationship between ipmap and netviewd is the same as ipmap and ovw. netviewd IS ovw. They are named differently but are the same, Im not positive and I don't have a NetView in front of me, but you might find that netviewd is actually a hardlink to ovw. So if you were to say kill netviewd, I would absolutely expect ipmap for that map to core. Paul Qureshi, Fawad wrote: Netview 7.1.3 - AIX 5.1Can someone please explain the relationship between netviewd and ipmap? ipmap cored twice in our environment and I was told that it had something to do with netviewd going down. I have a PMR open on this but have not beenable to get a good answer so far. CheersFawad Qureshi Division of Network Engineering - SSA / RSIS |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Polling devices that are loadhosts'd into object database, Christopher J Petrina |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Polling devices that are loadhosts'd into object database, Stephen Hochstetler |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Netviewd and ipmap, Qureshi, Fawad |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Netviewd and ipmap, Colson, Donna |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web