To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Local SNMP traps |
From: | John M Gatrell <John.Gatrell@uk.ibm.com> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Jan 2004 11:27:11 +0000 |
Delivery-date: | Mon, 26 Jan 2004 12:01:27 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Is it the network that has certain ports banned, or have I misunderstood the question? Would this devious method work? Secure the traffic between the Tec boxes with IPsec. Then set up an IP filter list for snmp (see MS technet bulletin 313381). The snmp traffic would then flow through the same IPsec tunnel, and could not be stopped by access-lists in routers. Once the traffic reaches a box under your control, feed it into an MLM (Mid level manager) for forwarding onto netview. John Gatrell. I have an snmp related question. If I have an application on a server that spews SNMP traps, and there is a Tivoli EP on the server, is there a way that I an redirect the SNMP traps to flow through the Tivoli framework? We are in a secure network, and every additional communication requirement is met with some resistance, so I am trying to find a workaround for this, instead of having SNMP flow through to the Gateway (where I would run the TEC SNMP adapter) or to NetView. Thanks, Brian |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Local SNMP traps, Jane Curry |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [nv-l] xnmgraph problem, Costas Vergakis |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Local SNMP traps, Jane Curry |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Local SNMP traps, David . Hustace |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web