RE: [nv-l] xnmgraph problem

To:	nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject:	RE: [nv-l] xnmgraph problem
From:	Costas Vergakis <vergakis@yahoo.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:45:21 -0800 (PST)
Delivery-date:	Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:14:21 +0000
Envelope-to:	nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
In-reply-to:	<236AF96C8C1EF64C8B262E0E7E32449E079D2004@pbosexch06.jhancock.com>
Reply-to:	nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender:	owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

Worked just fine for me too!
Many thanks to you all for the great help.

Costas

--- "Kenney, Jack" <jkenney@jhancock.com> wrote:
> Sorry, should have also mentioned that we have found
> something of a
> workaround for this problem.
> Try using the -resolution parameter, e.g.
> -resolution 5.
> It may change the appearance of the graphs,
> somewhat, but the craziness of
> the values should disappear.
> At least it did in our case.
> Hope this works.
> 

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[nv-l] xnmgraph problem, Costas Vergakis [nv-l] xnmgraph problem, Costas Vergakis Re: [nv-l] xnmgraph problem, James Shanks RE: [nv-l] xnmgraph problem, Kenney, Jack RE: [nv-l] xnmgraph problem, Kenney, Jack RE: [nv-l] xnmgraph problem, Costas Vergakis <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [nv-l] nvdbfromat Dr. Watson, Oliver Bruchhaeuser
Next by Date:	RE: [nv-l] ATM problem, DSullinger
Previous by Thread:	RE: [nv-l] xnmgraph problem, Kenney, Jack
Next by Thread:	[nv-l] nvdbfromat Dr. Watson, Christopher J Petrina
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]