To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [nv-l] SNMP poll vs Ping poll |
From: | CMazon@commercebankfl.com |
Date: | Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:59:58 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:09:00 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
(-Attempt #2 -This was a response to James Shanks answer under the subject "Unmanaged Interfaces") So you would say not have everything SNMP polled except for routers/switches unless needed otherwise? Maybe I am going about my config all wrong but I try to have every node (Servers and routers/switches) snmp polled if its capable of it vs being pinged. I was under the impression that it should be that way. I would say my environment is small compared to what I have heard/read in this newsgroup (550 nodes) but we are steadily growing. Carlos Mazon |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Cisco-products.mib, Christopher J Petrina |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Cisco-products.mib, Jeff Fitzwater |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Cisco-products.mib, Christopher J Petrina |
Next by Thread: | [nv-l] send different events to tec, lucian . vanghele |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web