| To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | [nv-l] SNMP poll vs Ping poll | 
| From: | CMazon@commercebankfl.com | 
| Date: | Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:59:58 -0500 | 
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:09:00 +0000 | 
| Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk | 
| Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com | 
| Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com | 
| (-Attempt #2 -This was a response to James Shanks answer under the subject "Unmanaged Interfaces") So you would say not have everything SNMP polled except for routers/switches unless needed otherwise? Maybe I am going about my config all wrong but I try to have every node (Servers and routers/switches) snmp polled if its capable of it vs being pinged. I was under the impression that it should be that way. I would say my environment is small compared to what I have heard/read in this newsgroup (550 nodes) but we are steadily growing. Carlos Mazon | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Cisco-products.mib, Christopher J Petrina | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Cisco-products.mib, Jeff Fitzwater | 
| Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Cisco-products.mib, Christopher J Petrina | 
| Next by Thread: | [nv-l] send different events to tec, lucian . vanghele | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] | 
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web