To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] SAN switch traps |
From: | James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Thu, 8 Apr 2004 09:32:16 -0400 |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 08 Apr 2004 14:43:33 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <OF89A8AFA1.9D68415A-ONC2256E70.004909A5-C2256E70.00490A07@bisnet.ro> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
OK, so you are saying that you get the traps but they are garbled; the format is not what you expected. That's what I was trying to clarify. So that is good. It means (1) that the traps are being sent by Brocade, (2) they are in SNMP V1 format so NetView for Windows can receive them, and (3) they are being received, and formatted in some fashion, even if not correctly, by what you have in trapd.conf. So at this point you should be able to edit the definition for these traps in trapd.conf with Trap Settings and change it. Is that what you are having trouble with? Or did you want to review the process by which you imported the trap definitions into trapd.conf in the first place to figure out where it went wrong? James Shanks Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
in the mean time I realized that those traps are not correctly because in their definition I have %d and not $d (for example) so they are only some kind of models (?) as far as I understand.... referring to your question: I don' have "no fmt found" traps. I'm sure lots of such traps are sent by brocade switches: my events is somtehing like: trapname: swFCPortScn severity : Warning source: Agent category: Error Enterprise: sw Trap: 3 time:...... Node: 10.16.131.26 - and this is the switch address Description .... what I sent before I'm not sure what you mean with "device or software log ...to find out". I don't think traps are sent in V2 format as far as I can see them in my event console (even if uncorrecly formated) and I see them all in trapd.log. BUT in my mib file these are notification-type (this is snmp V2 name for trap-type ?) and also I think I had some problem to import them with mib2trap. in nv.log not traps are discarded! I have ethereal installed to capture traffic especially on port 162 but I don't see why to start capture at this moment as far as I'm very sure these traps are from Brocade switch ... thanks a lot James.. as allways your response are very good! Lucian ps I hope I made my self clear... :)
hi there list ! I want to send traps from a Brocade SAN switch to a windows nv 713 and I receive allways messages like that: - PORT INDEX %d changed to %d Port Name: %s and SSN is #%s, GroupName %s, GroupType %s, GroupMemPosition %d I'm sure I imported correctly the traps from the switch mib file so... what could be the reason? It really doesn't help now. thanks Lucian Sincerely Yours / al Dvs. Lucian Vanghele, Senior System Engineer, Business Information Systems- BIS srl tf./fax:+4021 255 4579 This message is strictly confidential, between the emitter's and the addressee's companies. It's mandatory to have the approval of the initiator, to send it entirely or partially, to a third company. Acest mesaj este strict confidential , pentru companiile emitentului si receptorului. Pentru a putea fi transmis, intreg sau partial, unei terte companii, este obligatoriu a avea aprobarea initiatorului. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] SAN switch traps, James Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] DNS Fully qualified names, Leslie Clark |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] SAN switch traps, James Shanks |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] SAN switch traps, John Sobrinho |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web