To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [nv-l] SNMP Community Strings |
From: | "Frank W. Hansen" <fhansen@enterpriseinnovations.com> |
Date: | Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:42:21 -0400 (EDT) |
Cc: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:51:01 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Importance: | Normal |
In-reply-to: | <OF4D21C29B.CC9603A4-ON85256E53.0054E0ED-85256E53.00572F5F@ca.ibm.com> |
References: | <20D410241D54BC47A0F6F4FAA0C39182650A46@concernres01.ubn.unive.nl> <OF4D21C29B.CC9603A4-ON85256E53.0054E0ED-85256E53.00572F5F@ca.ibm.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
User-agent: | SquirrelMail/1.4.2 |
Greetings all. Is there a limit to the way NetView handles the ro/rw commuity strings under "SNMP Configuration" setup? For example, I have the following Read-Only community string: FtFF&^ddd7&frgt When I issue an snmpwalk from the command line as follows: snmpwalk -c FtFF\&\^ddd7\&frgt HOSTNAME This works just fine. I've tried adding the escape slashes to the "SNMP Configuration" setup and am still not having any luck. Any ideas? -- Best Regards, Frank W. Hansen www.EnterpriseInnovations.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] GTMD Trap interface, Paul |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Finding offending application, Evans, Bill |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Finding offending application, Brian W Green |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] SNMP Community Strings, James Shanks |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web