|
James, you are right! Mea culpa... and there is no
excuse for this (maybe only the rush)
back to the problem now:
- I have a cluster on AIX 5.1.0.0 using
snmpv1 (this is a SWIFT cluster not netview so I don't have trapgend or
mgragentd entries in snmpd.conf)
- on each machine is one Powerware UPS, connected
with serial cable
- I want to manage these UPS's using LanSafe 5.0.3
(this is Powerware software)
- after installing LanSafe (and it's snmp agent
component) snmpd.conf and snmpd.peers are correctly modified so they contain
the correct entries for the LanSafe smux agent
- in /var/tmp/snmpd.log I see these:
07/08/04 15:32:15 NOTICE: SMUX packet from
(192.168.3.5+50239+2)
07/08/04 15:32:15 NOTICE: SMUX open: 2 mib-2.33.1
"LanSafe SMUX Peer daemon" (10/ 192.168.3.5+50239+2)
07/08/04 15:32:15
NOTICE: SMUX packet from (192.168.3.5+50239+2)
07/08/04 15:32:15 DEBUG:
sending register response to (SMUX 192.168.3.5+50239+2)
07/08/04 15:32:15
NOTICE: SMUX register: readWrite 1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1 in = -1 out = 0
(192.168.3.5+50239+2)
07/08/04 15:32:20 DEBUG: add route: 2/0.0.0.0 w/mask
NONE on interface 0x328ac268 with flags 65539
07/08/04 15:32:20 DEBUG: add
route: 2/127.0.0.0 w/mask 255.0.0.0 on interface 0x8cee18 with flags
1
07/08/04 15:32:20 DEBUG: add route: 2/149.134.0.0 w/mask 255.255.0.0 on
interface 0x328ac268 with flags 65539
07/08/04 15:32:20 DEBUG: add route:
2/192.168.0.0 w/mask 255.255.255.0 on interface 0x328ac268 with flags
1
07/08/04 15:32:20 DEBUG: add route: 2/192.168.0.4 w/mask NONE on interface
0x8cee18 with flags 2055
07/08/04 15:32:20 DEBUG: add route: 2/192.168.1.0
w/mask 255.255.255.0 on interface 0x328ac134 with flags 1
07/08/04 15:32:20
DEBUG: add route: 2/192.168.1.6 w/mask NONE on interface 0x8cee18 with flags
2055
07/08/04 15:32:20 DEBUG: add route: 2/192.168.3.0 w/mask 255.255.255.0
on interface 0x328ac000 with flags 1
07/08/04 15:32:20 DEBUG: add route:
2/192.168.3.5 w/mask NONE on interface 0x8cee18 with flags 2055
07/08/04
15:32:20 DEBUG: add route: 2/192.168.4.0 w/mask 255.255.255.0 on interface
0x328ac39c with flags 1
07/08/04 15:32:20 DEBUG: add route: 2/192.168.4.7
w/mask NONE on interface 0x8cee18 with flags 2055
07/08/04 15:32:20 DEBUG:
add route: 24/ w/mask NONE on interface 0x8cee18 with flags 5
07/08/04
15:32:20 DEBUG: sending request to (SMUX
192.168.3.5+50239+2)
07/08/04 15:32:35 EXCEPTIONS: no response after
15 seconds (SMUX 192.168.3.5+50239+2)
07/08/04 15:32:35 DEBUG:
sending request to (SMUX 127.0.0.1+50231+1)
- trying to browse the UPS mib tree
(1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1) I receive "no values returned
for query"
- on the other hand, there is a smux agent
for hacmp, correctly configured
(clsmuxpd 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.3.1.2.1.5 "clsmuxpd_password" # HACMP for AIX
clsmuxpd )
- when I try to browse risc6000clsuxpd mib
tree (1.3.6.1.4.1.2.3.1.2.1.5) I receive "no
values returned for query"
So, if none of these two is working, what could be
wrong? Now I'll try to resolve first the clsmuxpd problem (in order to be sure
the mechanism is functional) and then I'll try the LanSafe agent.
I hope this time the email is
complete.
thanks a lot for the time and
patience...
Sincerely Yours / al Dvs.
Lucian
Vanghele,
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 3:35
PM
Subject: Re: [nv-l] lansafe smux
Lucian,
I don't
mean to be rude, but when are you going to start providing information when
you ask questions? How can anyone even try to help you with weird stuff
if you don't tell us what you have done so far, or what your configuration
looks like? risc6000clsuxpd? So I take it you are on AIX?
What level? Version 5? Is snmpd operating as snmpdv3
or v1? If v3, are you sure your agent supports that?
On AIX smux requires matching entries in
the /etc/snmpd.peers file and the /etc/snmpd.conf file. One, the peers,
tells the agent what community name to use and MIB OID to respond
to. The other, the conf, tells snmpd the same thing. Take a look
at the NetView entries for trapgend or mgragentd and you'll see what I
mean. Those work don't they? Well if they do and the others don't,
then those other agents are not configured properly.
James Shanks
Level 3 Support for Tivoli
NetView for UNIX and Windows
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
lucian.vanghele@bisnet.ro
Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
07/08/2004 07:35 AM
|
|
To
| nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| Re: [nv-l] lansafe
smux |
|
you
are right! I already contacted powerware local distribuitor. On the other hand
I tried to browse the risc6000clsmuxpd mib tree and I have the same
error!!
Sincerely Yours / al Dvs.
Lucian Vanghele,
Paul
<pstroud@bellsouth.net>
Sent by:
owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
07/08/2004 06:05 AST
Please respond to nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
|
To
|
nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
|
|
cc
|
|
|
bcc
|
|
|
Subject
|
Re: [nv-l] lansafe smux
|
|
| |
This really
looks like a problem with the agent. You should be talking
to lansafe, they
should be able to assist you.
Paul
Lucian Vanghele wrote:
> no ideas?
>
>
Sincerely Yours / al Dvs.
> Lucian Vanghele,
>
> -----
Original Message -----
> From: <lucian.vanghele@bisnet.ro>
>
To: <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 2:58
PM
> Subject: [nv-l] lansafe
smux
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>hi
there!
>>I'm trying to manage some UPSs via LanSafe Agent and I have
some problems
>>
>>- after I installed the LanSafe Agent in
snmpd.log I saw something like
>>EXCEPTIONS: duplicate listeners
0.0.0.0.0
>>NOTICE: SMUX relation started with
(192.168.3.5+45649+2)
>>NOTICE: SMUX open: 2 mib-2.33.1 "LanSafe SMUX
Peer Daemon" (10/
>
>
192.168.3.5
>
>>+45649+2)
>>NOTICE: SMUX register
readWrite 1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1 in = -1 out =
0
>>(192.168.3.5+45649+2)
>>EXCEPTIONS: no response after 15
seconds (SMUX 192.168.3.5+45649+2)
>>
>>trying to browse the
.33 tree I receive "no values returned for query"
>>any ideea will be
welcome!
>>thanks
>>Sincerely Yours / al
Dvs.
>>Lucian Vanghele
>>
>
>
>
|