To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [nv-l] Netview Rule - corrected |
From: | wolfgang.bergbauer@attglobal.net |
Date: | Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:39:56 +0200 |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:45:08 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sensitivity: |
Hi all, Sorry that I bring up this endless story: I want a simple correlation and have also seen examples for it: 1. Node_Down is delayed by a reset on match with Node_UP for 5 minutes 2. As the Node_Down is forwarded, it is also redirected to a Pass on Match 3. The Pass on Match maps takes also the Node Up event as input and should forward only for forwarded Node_Down events In the Pass on Match I defined 72 hours as event retention. So we do not want all the Node Up´s in TEC just the ones which triggered Node Downs. The point is it does not work (Netview 7.1.4 FP01, AIX 5.2). I do not get any Node_Up event if I do it as outlined The reset on match is defined: Node_Down --> Input_1 --> Reset on match --> Forward Node_Up --> Input_2 --> Reset on match --> Input 2 --> Pass on match Node_Up --> Input_1 --> Pass on match --> Forward Kind regards Wolfgang ------------------------------------------------------------------ Wolfgang Bergbauer Network and System Management Consultant Cell phone: +49 172 534 9131 E-mail: wolfgang.bergbauer@attglobal.net |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l] Netview Rule, wolfgang . bergbauer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Netview Web Client Question, Duppong, Jason |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Netview Rule, wolfgang . bergbauer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Netview Rule - corrected, James Shanks |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web