To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Routers in Isolated Subnet |
From: | James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Fri, 10 Dec 2004 10:18:50 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:19:24 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <8742587DC4A5A845A26EC01E75DE7232B46F51@ech01awp.corp.ds.pjm.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
I was hoping that someone with more experience with RFI would try to answer you on this, but since no one has, here's my two cents.
We have parallel paths between critical servers. If a router on one path is down, the admins will be notified. If a router on the second path goes down, they will also be notified. Additionally, with both paths down, the admins want to know what routers are now isolated. Will there be a router unreachable event for each one, following or preceding the subnet unreachable? How can we relate them to the source problem? Does RFI keep a list of the relationships or have a utility to determine them? Do I have access to it? After a pager alert, these folks will most likely login from a remote location and open their e-mail. That's where we're trying to put the information and why we're not telling them to look at the map. Thanks.
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Netview Books, James Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [nv-l] December 2004 updates to NetView 7.1.4 documentation, Mary Sturgeon |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Routers in Isolated Subnet, SIXFC |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Routers in Isolated Subnet, Leslie Clark |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web