nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] Authentication failures coming Netview

To: <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Authentication failures coming Netview
From: "Treptow, Craig" <Treptow.Craig@principal.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:14:40 -0600
Delivery-date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:15:17 +0000
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Thread-index: AcTzR7fQIZ7oIe1jQlKePA1cBuAdIgAAj88A
Thread-topic: [nv-l] Authentication failures coming Netview
Thanks.  I have opened a PMR this morning.  I will update the list when I know more.
 
I appreciate all of your suggestions.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]On Behalf Of Mark Sklenarik
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 10:51 AM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Authentication failures coming Netview


Hi Craig,
Sorry this is the first I have seen your reply.  
It appears there is a bug in NetView, your best option is to call IBM Support for future debug assistance.
I would have to start asking for netmon traces and ip traces, to determine when and why NetView is making request with incorrect community names.
So at the time of failure, the output from netmon -a 175 shows that NetView has the correct community name stored?

How many communities are listed in /usr/OV/conf/communityNames.conf file?
Is the MaximumCommunityNames parameter set on /usr/OV/conf/netmon.conf? Only have to set this if more than the default of 6 communities are used.


Mark F Sklenarik
 IBM SWG Tivoli Solutions
 Quality Assurance
  Business Impact Management and Event Correlation
 Software Quality Engineer
 IBM Corporation



"Treptow, Craig" <Treptow.Craig@principal.com>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

01/05/2005 09:48 AM
Please respond to
nv-l

To
"NetView List \(E-mail\)" <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
cc
Subject
Re: [nv-l] Authentication failures coming Netview





Hi.  I have lost your replies, so I'm replying to what I'm reading on the archives.

To Mark Sklenarik:

Yes, the device looks good in the xnmsnmpconf view.

There is nothing else on this machine except Netview, so I doubt something else is doing it, but I will take another look.

We do have /usr/OV/conf/communityNames.conf, and the strings being tried are listed in that file.

No, it was not trying public.

I did the netmon -a 160 and 175 commands.  The device looks fine in that output.

snmpCollect is not collecting from anything.


To James Robin:

Yes, this is a Cisco router and we gave these lines in the config:

snmp-server community XXXXXXX RO 80
snmp-server community YYYYYYY RW 81
snmp-server host 162.131.23.89 public
snmp-server host 162.131.38.61 public


-----Message Disclaimer-----

This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
reply email to Connect@principal.com and delete or destroy all copies of
the original message and attachments thereto. Email sent to or from the
Principal Financial Group or any of its member companies may be retained
as required by law or regulation.

Nothing in this message is intended to constitute an Electronic signature
for purposes of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) or the
Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act ("E-Sign")
unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message.



-----Message Disclaimer-----

This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
reply email to Connect@principal.com and delete or destroy all copies of
the original message and attachments thereto. Email sent to or from the
Principal Financial Group or any of its member companies may be retained
as required by law or regulation.

Nothing in this message is intended to constitute an Electronic signature
for purposes of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) or the
Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act ("E-Sign")
unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web