To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] NV tuning for Data collection |
From: | Leslie Clark <lclark@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:31:51 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 12 Jan 2005 22:28:43 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <C353F42ACF29E240B9050B86F1852A4F0C2673@nlspm204.emea.corp.eds.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Startup of snmpCollect may be slow. Turn on the tracing and watch what it is doing at startup, so you know whether to worry or not. I've found snmpCollect to be pretty efficient at collecting, and at minimizing its impact on the devices by grouping stuff together. Where you may have trouble is with those per-interface values on devices with lots of interfaces. There is a parameter for the snmpCollect daemon for the maxpdu that controls how much data it will request at once. It defaults to 100 somethings. I've sometimes changed it to 50 somethings, so snmpCollect breaks the request into smaller packages. This avoids loss of data caused by the device refusing to deliver too-large responses. There is also, under the Options....SNMP Config, the timeout and retries settings. I know this applies to snmp requests from other parts of Netview, but I have never been sure whether it applied to snmpCollect or not. You will also have trouble with some of those interface counters if the interfaces are very high speed. Netview currently will only collect 32bit values (Counter32), and for gig interfaces, the values wrap much too quickly. So take a look at which instances you really need, and what the rate of flow really is. There is no point collecting it if it is bad data. Look for sub-interface instances with lower rates of flow and see if that will give you what you need. When you update snmpCollect configuration via the gui, it updates /usr/OV/conf/snmpCol.conf and stop/starts snmpCollect. You can edit that file manually. If you find that you want to collect a variety of different interface instances on each device, you could generate that file programmatically. I'm suggesting that with large numbers of devices, entering *.*.*.* or Routers just because it is easy is not always the best choice. Try making fancy entries via the gui and then check the results in snmpCol.conf. Then write a little script to generate the repetitive parts. Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Hi list, I've been reading nv-l archives for quite some times and benefit from them. Now I post my first question to get your advice/help. We are collecting quite a lot data every 15 mins (supposed to), but till now only part of the collection happened (everyday less than half i.e. 40 collections per definition per device, sometimes even null). My basic question is: can NV handle that many collections? Because when I suspended more than half of the collections (interface data). It seemed working fine. If yes, how can I tune the NV? Where can I find the document for the tuning (snmpCollect daemon settings)? Here's some basic info. NV 7.1.2 on Solaris 2.8. Data collection of about 600 devices with 1) SysUptime for all of them 2) cpmCPUTotal5min for 400 devices (cisco) 3) ciscoMemoryPoolUsed for 400 devices 4) ciscoMemoryPoolFree for 400 devices 5) ifInUcastPkts, ifOutUcastPkts, ifInErrors, ifOutErrors, ifAdminStatus, ifOperStatus, ifLastChange, ifInOctets, ifOutOctets, ifInDiscards, ifOutDiscards, ifInNUcastPkts, ifOutNUcastPkts for about 200 devices with lot of interfaces 6) Some latency data for 10 routers Our current snmpCollect (daemon) settings: Defer time: 60 Max PDU: 50 Config check interval: 1440 Max concurrent SNMP sessions: 50 Verbose trace mode : Yes Polling interval for nvcold: 60 Thank you in advance. Regards, David |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Re: [nv-l] Discovering networks without switches but with DHCP Nodes, Leslie Clark |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] NV tuning for Data collection, Joe Fernandez |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] NV tuning for Data collection, Liu, David |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] NV tuning for Data collection, Allison, Jason \(JALLISON\) |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web