To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Netview / TEC co-existence |
From: | Gareth Holl <gholl@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:23:05 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:23:35 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <91D03459CD3BE04DB5C9894069B252340541AA95@omaexch03.csg.csgsystems.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
I do it (with the exception of ITM) and have for a long time but my environment is not a production environment under production loads. The point is, its works fine and my only concern would be the load on the box, especially if it is also going to be your Database Server ! I'm assuming we are talking UNIX though !!! One thing to watch (and I'm not sure if this is still as issue) is the order in which TEC and NetView are started. Gareth Holl Staff Software Engineer gholl@us.ibm.com ITIL Foundations Certified IBM Certified Deployment Professional --Tivoli Data Warehouse v1.2 --Tivoli Enterprise Console v3.8 Network Management IBM Software Group - Tivoli Software Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
I'm looking for a laundry list of pros and cons on running NetView on the same machine as TEC / ITM / Framework Can anyone provide some recommendations for or against? Scott Barr Systems Engineer CSG Systems Inc. 402-431-7939 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l] Netview / TEC co-existence, Barr, Scott |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Netview / TEC co-existence, Barr, Scott |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Netview / TEC co-existence, Barr, Scott |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Netview / TEC co-existence, Jane Curry |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web