Yes the environment we are talking about
is:
Solaris 2.8
VCS clustering
TEC 3.8 (could be 3.9)
NetView v7.1.x
ITM 5.1
Framework 4.1 (could be 4.1.1)
Oracle databases
The boxes are 4x processors with 4 gb of
memory.
Peak event volumes are 3-4 events a
second. Trap storms can drive it much higher – we are shooting for the
capability to handle 20-30 incoming events (inclusive of SNMP traps to NetView)
I don’t see us getting the SNMP adapter for TEC since we already have
NetView and a lot of customization.
Hope this helps round out the question.
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Gareth Holl
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005
4:23 PM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Netview / TEC
co-existence
I do it (with the exception of ITM) and have for a long
time but my environment is not a production environment under production loads.
The point is, its works fine and my only concern would be the load on the box,
especially if it is also going to be your Database Server ! I'm assuming we are
talking UNIX though !!!
One
thing to watch (and I'm not sure if this is still as issue) is the order in
which TEC and NetView are started.
Gareth Holl
Staff Software Engineer
gholl@us.ibm.com
ITIL Foundations Certified
IBM Certified Deployment Professional
--Tivoli Data Warehouse v1.2
--Tivoli Enterprise Console v3.8 Network Management
IBM Software Group - Tivoli
Software
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
"Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr@csgsystems.com>
Sent
by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
03/16/2005 05:08 PM
|
To
|
<nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
[nv-l] Netview / TEC co-existence
|
|
I'm
looking for a laundry list of pros and cons on running NetView on
the same machine as TEC / ITM / Framework
Can anyone provide some recommendations for or
against?
Scott Barr
Systems Engineer
CSG Systems Inc.
402-431-7939