To: | <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [nv-l] netmon connected to trapd |
From: | "Allison, Jason \(JALLISON\)" <JALLISON@arinc.com> |
Date: | Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:54:22 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:54:52 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Thread-index: | AcU1HpLV+9DJJifQQ5uKoD7T5bHzFwACKvwg |
Thread-topic: | [nv-l] netmon connected to trapd |
Its normal. Maybe someone can explain it though. Jason Allison Principal Engineer ARINC Incorporated -----Original Message----- From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Haseneder, Martina Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 6:50 AM To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com Subject: [nv-l] netmon connected to trapd Hi folks, to check EventForwarding I put out a "Node Up" Event of the NetView-Server itself every 10 Minutes like: event -h un102 -E 58916864 -s N Now in the trapd.log with every NV-Server Node Up Event I find these lines: 1112170937 7 Wed Mar 30 10:22:17 2005 <none> N netmon connected to trapd. 1112170937 3 Wed Mar 30 10:22:17 2005 un102 N Node Up 1112170937 7 Wed Mar 30 10:22:17 2005 <none> N netmon disconnecting from trapd. Should it make me nervous? -- Martina Haseneder P542 Datennetz-/Systemprogrammierung Datev e.G. email: Martina.Haseneder@datev.de Tel: 0911 / 276-1063 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] IP Address and $A option for automated action, Paul |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] netmon connected to trapd, Oliver Bruchhaeuser |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] netmon connected to trapd, Haseneder, Martina |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] netmon connected to trapd, Oliver Bruchhaeuser |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web