nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [nv-l] Ruleset

To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Ruleset
From: Paul <pstroud@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:16:32 -0400
Delivery-date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:16:18 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
In-reply-to: <C353F42ACF29E240B9050B86F1852A4F0C273A@nlspm204.emea.corp.eds.com>
References: <C353F42ACF29E240B9050B86F1852A4F0C273A@nlspm204.emea.corp.eds.com>
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
David,
You should be able to do this in a ruleset, make sure you are using the
origin of the trap in the ruleset. For a netmon generated trap you would
use $2(which is the failing node), but  on an agent trap, you are going to
want to use Origin(in the smartset rule node). However, you might find
that the device is using an IP address that does not resolve to the hostname
and this causes the SmartSet check to fail. This may be part of the problem
but I cannot be sure.

Paul



Liu, David wrote:

Dear list,

I can use ruleset to exclude (filter) number of devices (smartset) from
interface down event (NV internal trap 58916867), but not the
Cisco_Link_down trap (generic 2, specific 0). Could anyone make a light for
me? The strange thing is filter works, ruleset not.

Regards,
David Liu



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web