RE: [nv-l] Ruleset problem with Netview 7.1.4 running RedHat Linu x AS 2.1

["Glen Warn" <Glen.Warn@pemcocorp.com>]

Hi Bill,

 

Thanks for your reply.  I was hoping to use the smartset because we manage networks for several companies and I was looking forward to highlighting the nodes I wanted to apply these rules to from a handful of submaps and adding them to the smartset.  Since the only criteria (I think) that I want to distiniquish on is the hostname - should I stay the course of the smartset?

 

Glen Warn

PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS)

glen.warn@pemcocorp.com

206-628-5770

 

---

From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Evans, Bill
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 10:35 AM
To: 'nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com'
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Ruleset problem with Netview 7.1.4 running RedHat Linu x AS 2.1

Another suggestion even stronger than Paul's; If your SmartSet is fairly simple and there's an alternative don't use it but use the alternative.  For example, you can query the database directly more cheaply than by using the SmartSet in cases like "isRouter=True and isSNMPSupported=False".

I've found a couple database calls or even offloading the check to a shell script can be faster than SmartSet access.    

Bill Evans
Tivoli NetView Support for DOE
301-903-0057

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 7:12 AM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Ruleset problem with Netview 7.1.4 running RedHat Linux AS 2.1

Glen,
As a general rule you do NOT want to make a query smartset your first
entry in any ruleset.
Query smartset is expensive, so you want to be sure you do it only on
the events you really need
to check.

Filter by the event first, then go to a smartset and actions or whatever:

                                                                            
-> Action - Send email
                                                                           
|
                       -> Node Down > Query Smartset \(slot 1)
EventStream-                                                         |->
Reset on Match > Pager > Action send email
                       -> Node Up > Query Smartset      /(slot 2)

Also, make sure your smartset has the nodes in the there that you are
concerned about.
Running "nvUtil l <smartsetname>" should show you the members of that
smartset. Make
sure the smartset is not blue on the map.

Paul

Glen Warn wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to build a ruleset that looks something like this (see
> below)  I am not a seasoned ruleset builder so please keep that in
> mind if you reply!
> 
>                                                                -> 
> Action - Email (historical log of node Down trap)
>                                                            ->
>                             ->Node Down Trap ->
>                         ->                                ->
> Event Stream ->                                      -> Reset on Match
> ->    Pager  ->  Action - Email (historical log of paged event)
>                         ->                               ->
>                             ->Node Up Trap    ->
> 
> This works just fine but has not event attribute filtering (like
> source host).  If I insert an Event Attribute #2 right after the Event
> Stream or before the Pager - it works perfectly.  Problem is, I want
> to query a smartset because I have so many different hosts that need
> this rule.  When I do insert the Query Smartset (in either of the 2
> positions described above) - the rule stops functioning.  I am using
> Object ID Source = 2 and using a smartset that includes the servers I
> want to monitor.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> Glen Warn
> PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS)
> glen.warn@pemcocorp.com <mailto:glen.warn@pemcocorp.com>
> 206-628-5770
>