To: | "'nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com'" <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [nv-l] Ruleset problem with Netview 7.1.4 running RedHat Linu x AS 2.1 |
From: | "Evans, Bill" <Bill.Evans@hq.doe.gov> |
Date: | Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:35:28 -0400 |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:36:27 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Another suggestion even stronger than Paul's; If your SmartSet is fairly simple and there's an alternative don't use it but use the alternative. For example, you can query the database directly more cheaply than by using the SmartSet in cases like "isRouter=True and isSNMPSupported=False". I've found a couple database calls or even offloading the check to a shell script can be faster than SmartSet access. Bill Evans
-----Original Message-----
Glen,
Filter by the event first, then go to a smartset and actions or whatever:
Also, make sure your smartset has the nodes in the there that you are
Paul Glen Warn wrote: > Hi,
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Ruleset problem with Netview 7.1.4 running RedHat Linux AS 2.1, Paul |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Ruleset problem with Netview 7.1.4 running RedHat Linu x AS 2.1, Glen Warn |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Ruleset problem with Netview 7.1.4 running RedHat Linux AS 2.1, Glen Warn |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Ruleset problem with Netview 7.1.4 running RedHat Linu x AS 2.1, Glen Warn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web