To: | <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] IBM Tivoli Netview for Linux Installation |
From: | "Rocco Scappatura" <rocsca@sttspa.it> |
Date: | Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:21:16 +0200 |
Delivery-date: | Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:22:17 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
References: | <OFD179CDC6.4D592121-ON8025704D.004A6EDD-8025704D.004ADC4A@uk.ibm.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Thanks, but what are the advantage of using ext3 against reiserf. Is It simple to modify the size of ext3 file system if necessary? BR, rocsca ----- Original Message ----- From: "John M Gatrell" <John.Gatrell@uk.ibm.com> To: <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 3:37 PM Subject: Re: [nv-l] IBM Tivoli Netview for Linux Installation > Stick with ext3 unless you are an expert. > (ext2 fast, ext3 rapid recovery after crash, reiserfs specialised). > > There was a case for /boot being ext2 on older versions of linux, > so stick with the default setting for /boot for your flavour of linux. > > /boot should be primary, the rest don't matter. > Suggest root and swap as primary. > > John Gatrell, BA, AIX Cert Specialist, Cisco CCNA. > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] IBM Tivoli Netview for Linux Installation, John M Gatrell |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] IBM Tivoli Netview for Linux Installation, John M Gatrell |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] IBM Tivoli Netview for Linux Installation, John M Gatrell |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] IBM Tivoli Netview for Linux Installation, John M Gatrell |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web