To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Net-snmp on suse 9 |
From: | George deSocio <desocio@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Mon, 3 Oct 2005 17:43:00 -0400 |
Delivery-date: | Mon, 03 Oct 2005 22:43:34 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <OFB911ABBB.F54F025E-ON8625708F.0057BC68-8525708F.0059AAC4@us.ibm.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Hello list, one more time, After one more test, I found there are two ways to build the flags for net-snmp's snmpd daemon that will correctly handle the pass statement in the conf file, and stay running. 1) -C -c /etc/snmpd.conf <or> -Cc /etc/snmpd/conf 2) <neither of the above, that is no -C, and no "-c /etc/snmpd.conf"> The conclusion I have come to is this: With only "-c /etc/snmpd.conf" coded (in /etc/init.d/snmpd after the rpm is installed), the default conf file, /etc/snmpd.conf, is being processed twice. Once because -C is not specified, and once because -c is specified. With a pass statement coded, processing the pass statement twice is what appears to cause the core. At least that's the mile high view based on what I can see in an strace output. With neither "-C" or "-c /etc/snmpd.conf" specified, the default is processed (which is /etc/snmpd.conf), snmpd activates correctly and works correctly. Regards, Geo. George deSocio IBM Americas Support - Distributed Network Management Dept 46-E1ZA Bldg B062 Office B318 PO Box 12195 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2195
Hello list, As a followup to the original question to the list: We found that the release of net-snmp found in some newer SUSE 9's, net-snmp-5.1-80.11, when the pass statement (any pass statement) is added to /etc/snmpd.conf, snmpd cores with signal 11 (SIGSEGV). This doesn't seem to be known in the net-snmp community. In /etc/init.d/snmpd script, there is a command, startproc. Add a -C flag after $SNMPD. After that change, the daemon comes up, processes the pass statement, and stays up. mgragentd also works and gets passed its oid part. I don't know why this works :-) But it does work around the problem as far as NetView is concerned. This looks like a bug in net-snmp. Regards, Geo. George deSocio IBM Americas Support - Distributed Network Management Dept 46-E1ZA Bldg B062 Office B318 PO Box 12195 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2195
Does anyone have net-snmp working on suse 9, instead of ucd-snmp? This is for netview 7.1.4 fixpack 3. If I put in the lines: pass .1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.4.6.1 /bin/sh /usr/OV/bin/mgragentd
Snmp won't start up. It starts up fine without these. TIA -Becki Kain
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l] Polling Intervals Info!, Larry Fagan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] automatic action is acting strangely Thanks working now., Pretorius, Vynita |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Net-snmp on suse 9, George deSocio |
Next by Thread: | [nv-l] Polling Intervals Info!, Larry Fagan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web