To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [nv-l] Discover & poll node only with snmp |
From: | Costas Vergakis <vergakis@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Fri, 27 Jan 2006 03:18:27 -0800 (PST) |
Delivery-date: | Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:19:07 +0000 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gNVQ3+knAo4K61ik2xMpCUVB8ISgHa8pKqmKG38AZLNVM9cFIRa6cDCnxXOOMp/xoq3OzSQrWPxze0TCSYJXvXufGFrUQri8PtYU5x3SLH+ZbJTszM2hn04zlntX3+hNVqZeZXFd43094E4u4NGMJ7L49dzl3j5UNh6g5tnXoMU= ; |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Hi everybody, I was wondering if there is a way to configure NetView to discover & poll a node with snmp when icmp is unavailable. For example i have a NetView server behind a FireWall and a couple of routers outside the FireWall but under my administration. The FireWall permits snmp requests from inside but denies icmp. Can i add those routers into my map? Because i have the impression that NetView needs at first to ping a router to discover and THEN uses snmp polling. I hope i'm wrong ;-) Thank you all in advance Costas [NetView 7.1.3, FP03 Solaris 7] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l] Please update my email-adress, Martina Haseneder |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Discover & poll node only with snmp, Colin Mulkerrins |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] What's the flow when trapd tec slot mappings are used as well as nvserverd w/ ruleset, Peter Raig |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Discover & poll node only with snmp, Colin Mulkerrins |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web