To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Ping is falling behind |
From: | Stephen Hochstetler <shochste@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:55:37 -0600 |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:56:32 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <4B5EAF921C5E3B458EA2C26A9B13323002511B56@pepwmu00023.corp.pep.pvt> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
There is a bit of an art to this since there are so many factors that could be involved.
NetView 7.1.4 AIX 5.2 * I am using the script below to check the ping status of NetView and I am seeing numbers around 30,000 at times. I am having problems with nodes going down for reboots and coming back up within about 5 minutes and I am getting node down events. I have a timer rule in place that says if I get a node down event hold it for 14 minutes. If I get a node up event drop the node down. If the 14 minutes expires and no node up event came in send the node down event. * Well the nodes are coming back well before the 14 minutes and we are still getting the node down. I believe that NetView being behind in polling is causing this. Are there any suggestions as to fixing the polling falling behind issue? * Within the last year SNMP was enabled on our workstation machines resulting in about 7000 new objects being discovered by NetView. Since they have the same OID as the Windows servers they are brought into discovery. I want to restrict them from being discovered by name. They all have a common set of characters in the name. The naming convention is ***wu****** or ***WU******. The same number of characters are used. If I read the documentation in the seed file correctly I could use this login correct? !???wu?????? !???WU????? Am I interpreting the question marks correctly from the documentation? # Negative Entries # e.g. !10.1.1.2 Specific entry # !10.*.1.1-100 Ranges using * or - # !router*.tivoli.com Wildcards using * and ?(single char) # !@oid 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.* Wildcards as final char using * # (Note space after the prefix "@oid ") # !@oid 0 This entry will filter out all # non-SNMP supported devices * I have unmanaged as many devices as I can that aren't being monitored at the moment and have restricted discovery to several OID's. My DNS in on another machine but on the same local subnet. Has anyone here written a script to test the speed of resolution from DNS? Here is the result of the ovobjprint -S command: ovobjprint -S Number of objects defined in the database: 93939 Total number of fields defined in the database is: 306. Total number of field values in the database: 1958450 Number of Integer fields: 511561. Number of Boolean fields: 754239. Number of String fields: 521397. Number of Enum fields: 171253. ##############################script#################################### ########## #!/bin/ksh #set -x cat /dev/null > /usr/OV/log/netmon.trace /usr/OV/bin/netmon -a 12 sleep 3 if [ -f /usr/OV/log/netmon.trace ]; then echo "Netmon is " `grep [-].*[:] /usr/OV/log/netmon.trace | wc -l ` "behind in status pinging"; else echo "Netmon is too busy to report now. Try later." fi exit ##############################script#################################### ########## I know this is a lot of information and I appreciate any and all feedback I get. Thank you, Scott Bursik PepsiCo |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | AW: [nv-l] Ping is falling behind, SCHIFFINGER Ralph |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Ping is falling behind, Bursik, Scott {PBSG} |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Ping is falling behind, Bursik, Scott {PBSG} |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Ping is falling behind, Bursik, Scott {PBSG} |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web