To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [nv-l] Ping is falling behind |
From: | Peter Raig <praig@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:08:10 -0500 |
Cc: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com, owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:05:57 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <4B5EAF921C5E3B458EA2C26A9B13323002511BBE@pepwmu00023.corp.pep.pvt> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
I'm Curious:since your holding your node downs for 14 minutes, are you still doing 3 retries before considering an IP to be down? Also, what's the delay on your name resolution like? you got thousands of those to do in a 5 minute poll cycle right?
My CPU is running pretty high constantly. Viewing topas here is what I see: Name PID CPU% PgSp Owner nvcorrd 17328 32.5 9.6 root netmon 54682 30.5 151.1 root ipmap 45592 28.8 245.6 root ovwdb 26948 4.5 310.6 root ovw_binar 43258 1.5 319.9 root Scott Bursik From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Bursik, Scott {PBSG} Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 10:28 AM To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com Subject: RE: [nv-l] Ping is falling behind Thank for the replies. I don’t see anything obvious here. Do you? ovwdb cache size? [pbsxsn00001][/usr/OV/bin]>ps -ef | grep ovwdb | grep -v grep root 26948 32324 4 Mar 13 - 192:07 /usr/OV/bin/ovwdb -O -n130000 –t ovobjprint -S Number of objects defined in the database: 93939 Total number of fields defined in the database is: 306. Total number of field values in the database: 1958450 Number of Integer fields: 511561. Number of Boolean fields: 754239. Number of String fields: 521397. Number of Enum fields: 171253. netmon status polling by ICMP or SNMP or both? ICMP Polling only [pbsxsn00001][/usr/OV/conf]>/usr/OV/bin/ovtopodump -l|grep ^NUMBER NUMBER OF NETWORKS: 11118 NUMBER OF SEGMENTS: 12594 NUMBER OF NODES: 22457 NUMBER OF INTERFACES: 37879 NUMBER OF GATEWAYS: 1337 [pbsxsn00001][/usr/OV/bin]>/usr/OV/bin/nvUtil e "('isNode' = 'TRUE') && ('IP Status' = 'Unmanaged')"|wc -l 9639 Scott Bursik Enterprise Systems Management PepsiCo Business Solutions Group (972) 963-1400 scott.bursik@pbsg.com From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of SCHIFFINGER Ralph Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 9:31 AM To: 'nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com' Subject: AW: [nv-l] Ping is falling behind ovwdb cache size?
/usr/OV/bin/ovobjprint -S
ps -ef | grep ovwdb | grep -v grep
/usr/OV/bin/ovtopodump -l|grep ^NUMBER
/usr/OV/bin/nvUtil e "('isNode'
= 'TRUE') && ('IP Status' = 'Unmanaged')"|wc -l
HTH Ralph S.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
NetView 7.1.4 AIX 5.2 * I am using the script below to
check the ping status of NetView and I
* Well the nodes are coming back
well before the 14 minutes and we are
* Within the last year SNMP was
enabled on our workstation machines
!???wu??????
Am I interpreting the question marks correctly from the documentation? # Negative
Entries * I have unmanaged as many devices
as I can that aren't being monitored
Here is the result of the ovobjprint -S command: ovobjprint -S
Total number of fields defined in the database is: 306. Total number of field values in
the database: 1958450 ##############################script####################################
I know this is a lot of information
and I appreciate any and all
Thank you, Scott Bursik
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Ping is falling behind, Stephen Hochstetler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Ping is falling behind, Bursik, Scott {PBSG} |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Ping is falling behind, Stephen Hochstetler |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Ping is falling behind, Bursik, Scott {PBSG} |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web