To: | nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [NV-L] Cisco Router Community String problem |
From: | "Evans, Bill" <Bill.Evans@hq.doe.gov> |
Date: | Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:11:40 -0400 |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:16:17 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help> |
List-id: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-subscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Reply-to: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
Sender: | nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com |
Thread-index: | AcarPmZaSnE6hRsCR3ivT0rU1kzAfQA2HVKA |
Thread-topic: | Cisco Router Community String problem |
Below is the TCPDUMP output for a sequence of requests to a Cisco router from NetView 7.1.4 on a SuSE 9.3 platform. I believe it's associated with a QUICKTEST request which fails. A subsequent DEMANDPOLL works. First: Can anyone interpret the "bad udp chksum xxxx!" part. For the initial request it seems to make no difference. Education is needed on my part. The device is a Catalyst 6509 with Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
09:07:53.144652 goshawk.nmic.doe.gov.50681 > CA0016K5.nmic.doe.gov.snmp: [bad udp cksum edf9!]
Second, The underlying problem is periodic failures of the SNMP status poll to this and other Cisco 6509 and 6513 devices running the s72033_rp level software. Associated with these failures are syslog entries specifying an authentication failure. The TCPDUMP trace shows no bad community strings sent but it does show records such as these (with bad UDP cksum). I can't correlate the GetRequest entries without a community string with these authentication failures. Any comments from the NetView community would be appreciated. I'm pushing the network engineers to bang on the Cisco side for what they can offer. Thanks to the community for past advice and in anticipation of future feedback. Bill Evans
-- _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [NV-L] Why isn't SWITCH ANALYZER packaged with NV, Jeff Fitzwater |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [NV-L] Why isn't SWITCH ANALYZER packaged with NV, James Shanks |
Previous by Thread: | [NV-L] Why isn't SWITCH ANALYZER packaged with NV, Jeff Fitzwater |
Next by Thread: | [NV-L] Paul Woodward is out of the office., Paul_Woodward |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web