To: | "Tivoli NetView Discussions" <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [NV-L] Netview not discovering |
From: | "Robson Souza" <robsoneng@gmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:39:30 -0300 |
Delivery-date: | Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:46:29 +0100 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=rHpmXRyjuQ5JzX9pS3gg/LGxYHme2YzvYr0YQSmygGOY6T3NqnJ4KiRhSEtwiH87G8YV8anox08SkF41Jyni8u0tumlutcgN9AnGtv3B703twdqY8MPhubiwIeClmlIokAWFdyajolPaiWShTa+Ui5B/ZIvgOCwh86vFV53lp9I= |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <OF475F1165.88DDD2E2-ON852571D4.004F006B-852571D4.004FE0A7@us.ibm.com> |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help> |
List-id: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-subscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: | <135f28c20608240544o69a9ccfbr360e0e28da4f588e@mail.gmail.com> <OF475F1165.88DDD2E2-ON852571D4.004F006B-852571D4.004FE0A7@us.ibm.com> |
Reply-to: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
Sender: | nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com |
Hi James,
Thx for your fast replying.
Yes, that's a new instalation, but we don't use names for the routers in our network. There are only routers ip addresses in the seed file. In any way, we just use name resolution for our servers and it's OK.
As you advised, we checked the machine and the Netview SNMP communities. There was really a difference between one and another one. After that, we have configured the both with the same community. But there have not been some effects.
The netmon trace was enabled with -1 option already. As I said, I can see in that file a lot of ping attempts to all of routers I have put in the seed file. But those pings does not happen effectively through a sniffer installed in the same machine.
Robson
On 8/24/06, James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> wrote:
Is this a brand new installation? Then I would check your name _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [NV-L] Integration with Ciscoworks LMS, Usman Taokeer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [NV-L] Anyone running Micro Muse Precision IP yet?, James Brunke |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [NV-L] Netview not discovering, James Shanks |
Next by Thread: | [NV-L] Backup Interface Discovery Issue, Larry Fagan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web