To: | "Tivoli NetView Discussions" <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [NV-L] Fine Tunning Polling Intervals! |
From: | "Evans, Bill" <Bill.Evans@hq.doe.gov> |
Date: | Sat, 21 Oct 2006 18:24:58 -0400 |
Delivery-date: | Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:29:20 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help> |
List-id: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-subscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Reply-to: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
Sender: | nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com |
Thread-index: | Acb1WHu8BERhTNIaSdelAn8jHkBtlgABHftg |
Thread-topic: | [NV-L] Fine Tunning Polling Intervals! |
Allow me to steal Francois' thunder on this one since it's
a weekend.
In my shop I use Ping polling for devices which have only
one interface and SNMP for routers and such which have more than one. Ping
polling is simpler because the SNMP poll is a query for the number of interfaces
present and a query for the ADMIN and OPER status of the interface.
This gives a more fine grained status than the Ping
can.
The result of Ping polling is either UP (green) or DOWN
(red). The result of SNMP polling may be UP, DOWN or ADMIN DOWN
(pink). Not a great difference but sometimes useful.
The big difference is in a secure environment where all but
the primary interface on a router is blocked from responding to Ping.
(I.e. Firewalls in our shop.) For Ping polling of multi-interface devices
you also must have every interface defined in the DNS or Hosts file resolving
back to the primary name. Those interfaces are also blocked from SNMP as
well.
As far as timing, either means of polling uses the same
configuration setting.
Francois did not identify what system he is using as the
NetView host. Windows systems default to a 20 minute polling interval and
Unix/Linux systems default to five minutes. This reflects the
capabilities of the underlying operating system. That said, Windows
on a powerful system can easily handle a five minute cycle if the universe of
supported devices isn't too large. 1200 nodes would not be considered a
heavy load. Read the hardware and software prerequisites for both
versions of NetView to get a good feel for the capabilities but keep in mind the
documents were written some time ago and todays medium size systems would have
been brutes back then.
Bill
Evans
From: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com [mailto:nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Usman Taokeer Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 5:26 PM To: Tivoli NetView Discussions Subject: Re: [NV-L] Fine Tunning Polling Intervals! Francois,
Just elaborate on your response, does it matter if the Poll is SNMP or
ICMP? Considering we have plenty of resources avaialble on the Server.
Regards,
Usman Taokeer
On 10/17/06, Francois Le
Hir <flehir@ca.ibm.com>
wrote:
It all depend on the resources of your server, but netview is able to poll -- -- _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [NV-L] Fine Tunning Polling Intervals!, Usman Taokeer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [NV-L] Diff between 7.1.4 FP5 and 7.1.5, Jeff Fitzwater |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [NV-L] Fine Tunning Polling Intervals!, Usman Taokeer |
Next by Thread: | [NV-L] NV 7.1.4 AIX--advice on ksh nmdemandpoll script--coprocessing, Van Order, Drew \(US - Hermitage\) |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web