To: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [NV-L] Best method to filter traps from specific IP addresses in ruleset |
From: | Leslie Clark <lclark@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:06:59 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:25:17 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <714EFC7999B7A640A33F0A9E5D88951202C90AC7@uscnt0495.us.deloitte.com> |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help> |
List-id: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-subscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Reply-to: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
Sender: | nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com |
It is good to worry about doing that from the TEC ruleset. What I have done in the past is an inline action, which also makes me nervous, that does a grep for the attribute in a flat file. Then you just administer the file. You will have to mess around with it to get the logic and return code evaluation right. Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt Information Technology Services Americas IBM Global Services (248) 552-4968 Voicemail, Fax, Pager
Hi everyone, Our customer has been receiving Peribit traps for a few weeks. It currently looks like this in the ruleset:
Trap Settings node for Peribit trap Enterprise ID (all traps highlighted) ----> Forward to TEC
Customer has requested that for just one of the traps, we only forward if it comes from 4 IP addresses, otherwise drop. I figure I will deselect this trap from the current Trap Settings node, then add a second Peribit Trap Settings node with just the one trap highlighted. It's after this step that I am wondering what will be most efficient. I know I can create a SmartSet with just these 4 IP addresses, but understand SmartSet queries in rulesets are very expensive, and I don't want to compromise performance since this is also our TEC_ITS ruleset. Is there a better way to do this w/o Smart Set query? I don't want to create a TEC rule for this, I think it's smarter to do it closest to the trap source. Thanks!---Drew Drew Van Order
_______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [NV-L] Best method to filter traps from specific IP addresses in ruleset, Van Order, Drew \(US - Hermitage\) |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [NV-L] Best method to filter traps from specific IP addresses in ruleset, Evans, Bill |
Previous by Thread: | [NV-L] Best method to filter traps from specific IP addresses in ruleset, Van Order, Drew \(US - Hermitage\) |
Next by Thread: | [NV-L] Add a User to the read-only map, Kelly Root |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web