To: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Splitting up TEC integration by using TEC_ITS and another ruleset for external traps in ESE.automation 7.1.4/7.1.5 |
From: | Leslie Clark <lclark@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:12:40 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Mon, 27 Nov 2006 18:15:02 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <714EFC7999B7A640A33F0A9E5D88951202C91670@uscnt0495.us.deloitte.com> |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help> |
List-id: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-subscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Reply-to: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
Sender: | nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com |
Here's what I have done for the external traps: For each MIB with traps, add to TEC_ITS.rs an Event Attribute cube specifying the Enterprise, with a Forward. In the trapd.conf for the traps in that Enterprise, set the ones you do NOT want to forward to Log Only. Nvserverd will not see those marked Log Only. This makes for a simple and fast filter on the traps. In the odd case where you need to filter one of those traps by device, add an additional Trap Settings for the specific trap, and do an inline action that greps a flat file. This externalizes some controls, eg the log only business and the flat file business so there is less complexity in the ruleset and less disruption of the flow of events when you want to make changes. Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt Information Technology Services Americas IBM Global Services (248) 552-4968 Voicemail, Fax, Pager
Anyone doing this successfully? I ask because TEC_ITS.rs is now unwieldy with both internal and external trap processing. We are also getting requests to perform additional filtering/processing on external traps prior to forwarding to TEC. It spooks me to think of doing this all in TEC_ITS. I thought a solution could be having a ruleset in ESE.automation that handles all external traps/processing. The forwarding to TEC would be handled by an Action node that fires a script invoking postemsg, or running postemsg directly and passing trap variables. Alas, it appears that none of the TEC slot mappings are passed as variables to an action node. Nor are they passed to the environment if you run an automatic action in trapd.conf. I searched the list archives before posting this, good chance someone has already asked this same question. Too bad nvserverd can't work with more than one ruleset; that would be the ideal situation. Thanks-- Drew Van Order
_______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [NV-L] TR: netview 7.1.4 (on aix 5.2) : ovtopofix error, D'Apice, Domenico |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Splitting up TEC integration by using TEC_ITS and another ruleset for external traps in ESE.automation 7.1.4/7.1.5, Greg Keetch |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Splitting up TEC integration by using TEC_ITS and another ruleset for external traps in ESE.automation 7.1.4/7.1.5, Van Order, Drew \(US - Hermitage\) |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Splitting up TEC integration by using TEC_ITS and another ruleset for external traps in ESE.automation 7.1.4/7.1.5, Greg Keetch |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web