To: | "Tivoli NetView Discussions" <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [nv-l] Splitting up TEC integration by using TEC_ITS and another ruleset for external traps in ESE.automation 7.1.4/7.1.5 |
From: | "Van Order, Drew \(US - Hermitage\)" <dvanorder@deloitte.com> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:44:00 -0600 |
Delivery-date: | Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:49:10 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Importance: | normal |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help> |
List-id: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-subscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Priority: | normal |
Reply-to: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
Sender: | nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com |
Thread-index: | AccSQz156YtifKSjQIihlBiTpYtaHw== |
Thread-topic: | [nv-l] Splitting up TEC integration by using TEC_ITS and another ruleset for external traps in ESE.automation 7.1.4/7.1.5 |
Anyone doing this successfully? I ask because TEC_ITS.rs is now unwieldy with both internal and external trap processing. We are also getting requests to perform additional filtering/processing on external traps prior to forwarding to TEC. It spooks me to think of doing this all in TEC_ITS. I thought a solution could be having a ruleset in ESE.automation that handles all external traps/processing. The forwarding to TEC would be handled by an Action node that fires a script invoking postemsg, or running postemsg directly and passing trap variables. Alas, it appears that none of the TEC slot mappings are passed as variables to an action node. Nor are they passed to the environment if you run an automatic action in trapd.conf. I searched the list archives before posting this, good chance someone has already asked this same question. Too bad nvserverd can't work with more than one ruleset; that would be the ideal situation. Thanks-- Drew Van Order
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.
Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. [v.E.1]
_______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [NV-L] Linux nodes, James Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [NV-L] TR: netview 7.1.4 (on aix 5.2) : ovtopofix error, D'Apice, Domenico |
Previous by Thread: | [NV-L] netview 7.1.5 SNMP Datacollection, Praveen Kumar |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Splitting up TEC integration by using TEC_ITS and another ruleset for external traps in ESE.automation 7.1.4/7.1.5, Leslie Clark |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web